2017
DOI: 10.1080/09542299.2017.1404437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the computed speciation of copper in a wide range of Chinese soils reliable?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oldest equation specifically applied to Cu was provided by Lexmond ( 1980 ) (see Eq. 11 in Table 1 ) to estimate bio-available Cu (expressed as − log(Cu) = pCu), and the last equation we found was designed by Li et al ( 2017a , b ) (see Eq. 10 in Table 1 ) to estimate bio-available Cu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The oldest equation specifically applied to Cu was provided by Lexmond ( 1980 ) (see Eq. 11 in Table 1 ) to estimate bio-available Cu (expressed as − log(Cu) = pCu), and the last equation we found was designed by Li et al ( 2017a , b ) (see Eq. 10 in Table 1 ) to estimate bio-available Cu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L −1 ) 0.69 0.5 0.73 0.36 86 56–4441 12.0–62 6.2–7.8 9b Log (Cu solution ) (µg. L −1 ) − 1.01 0.75 0.95 1.23 0.70 86 56–4441 12.0–62 6.2–7.8 Li et al ( 2017a , b ) 10a Log (Cu solution ) (µmol. L −1 ) − 2.976 0.515 1.23 0.63 34 a Data expressed in percentage of C b Data expressed in mg.kg −1 soil −1 of Cu …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lofts et al, 2013b;Tipping et al, 2003). Yet research focused on DOM binding properties in the past decade have shown that the binding properties of DOM to trace elements can vary considerably in soil and freshwater (Chen et al, 2018;Li et al, 2017;Weng et al, 2002). This has firstly been attributed to the substantial proportion of DOM corresponding to non-humic substances with binding properties that differ from that of benchmark fulvic acid (Baken et al, 2011;Groenenberg et al, 2010;Ren et al, 2015), and secondly to the variability in DOM properties such as its aromaticity, which seems to partly account for DOM binding properties (Amery et al, 2008;De Schamphelaere and Janssen, 2004).…”
Section: Variability In Dissolved Organic Matter Binding Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%