Is the distribution of cortical bone in the mandibular corpus and symphysis linked to loading environment in modern humans? A systematic review

Decaup, Pierre-Hadrien; Couture, Christine; Garot, Elsa

doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105718

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, descriptive statistics in the subgroups revealed greater cortical bone thicknesses in subjects with hypo-divergency, which aligns with the previous literature [4,23,[28][29][30]. This indicates the influence of facial morphology on mandibular cortical bone thickness [31]. To further explore this, statistical analysis was performed to assess if there were significant differences between subjects with different facial divergences within each site (M0, M2, M4).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Anatomical Bone Characteristics of the Buccal Step Insertion Site for Mini-Screw Placement in Orthodontic Treatment: A CBCT Study

Derton,

Bellocchio,

Ciancio

et al. 2024

Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To analyze the anatomical characteristics of a posterior area in the mandible localized distally to the second molars and extending in the vestibular direction toward the bony step, which we define as “buccal step”, in a patient with different skeletal patterns for mini-screw insertion. Methods: The sample included 85 CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) records selected from the digital archive. Analysis focused on the buccal step area. Sections were obtained in axial view using reference lines, and measurements of cortical and total bone were taken at specific points M0 (starting point, 6 mm apical from CEJc—cementoenamel junction crest), M2 (located 2 mm posterior to M0 in the apical direction), and M4 (positioned 4 mm posterior to M0 in the apical direction) in both directions. Six measurements were recorded for each scan root plane, assessing cortical and total bone depth. Results: The thickness of the bone increases toward the inside of the mouth at all tested sites (M0, M2, M4), which is good for placing mini-screws. Cortical bone thickness decreases toward the inside of the mouth, with no significant differences among the sites except for M0 vs. M4. People with a particular jaw shape (hypo-divergent) have a thicker cortical bone, indicating that facial structure affects bone thickness. Conclusions: The posterior buccal step insertion site has biomechanical advantages and reduces the risk of damaging roots during mini-screw insertions.

show abstract