2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Flynn effect on g?: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In case one wants to carry out an analysis on studies for which the individual-level data are unavailable and combine all these studies in a meta-analysis, the simplified procedure reported in Jensen [1] has to be applied. This combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies, some of them often cited [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case one wants to carry out an analysis on studies for which the individual-level data are unavailable and combine all these studies in a meta-analysis, the simplified procedure reported in Jensen [1] has to be applied. This combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies, some of them often cited [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of 11 studies yielded a moderate negative correlation between subtest g-loadings and secular gains (−0.26, which fell to −0.38 when 2 of the 11 tests were removed as outliers), suggesting that gains are generally smaller on more g-loaded tests [99]. While this is probably our best current estimate of the correlation between secular gains and g-loadings, the range of observed results found has been quite broad, with substantial positive correlations found in numerous studies (see also [100], p. 320).…”
Section: Suggestion 5: Use Iq Subtest Profiles In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly, the construct g evidences a negative correlation of about 0.4 with the Flynn effect which admittedly leaves a fair amount of variance unaccounted for in this association. Nonetheless, the argument is bolstered by the fact that Flynn effects are not associated with Jensen effects which suggest significant correlations between high g-loaded items and g. In essence, the Flynn effect is 'hollow' regarding g and is caused mainly by environmental effects (TE NIJENHUIS and VAN DER VLIER 2013;WOODLEY and MEISENBERG 2013).…”
Section: Has There Been Recent Evolution?mentioning
confidence: 99%