2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13105705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Greening Instrument a Valid Precedent for the New Green Architecture of the CAP? The Case of Spain

Abstract: The Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020, set up in 2015 and extended until 31 December 2022, introduced a payment instrument called Greening. The aim of Greening was to encourage agricultural practices that are beneficial for the environment while also contributing to economic and territorial dynamism. The purpose of this article is to study the effect that Greening has had in Spain. We consider five difference-in-difference models, one for each of the variables proposed: ecological focus areas, permanent gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, Díaz-Poblete et al [71] conducted an ex post facto study limited to Spain using the statistical technique difference in differences (DiD), concluding that greening had a limited impact, its efficiency for meeting its goal was questionable, and that it was not a sound precedent for building the new green architecture of the CAP. According to Louhichi et al [72] the CAP greening effect on farm income was rather small at the aggregate level, which was the result of the fact that the majority of farms had complied with the greening requirements from the starting point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, Díaz-Poblete et al [71] conducted an ex post facto study limited to Spain using the statistical technique difference in differences (DiD), concluding that greening had a limited impact, its efficiency for meeting its goal was questionable, and that it was not a sound precedent for building the new green architecture of the CAP. According to Louhichi et al [72] the CAP greening effect on farm income was rather small at the aggregate level, which was the result of the fact that the majority of farms had complied with the greening requirements from the starting point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, grassland is considered very important for biodiversity conservation, soil protection, and carbon sequestration [76,77], and afforestation poses a threat to semi-natural habitats with characteristic and highly localised plant communities, such as grasslands [78]. In order to prevent massive conversion of permanent grassland to cropland, the current EU regulations include a requirement to maintain the proportion of permanent grassland in agricultural land across the country, which must not decrease by more than 5% compared to the 2015 reference year [79,80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of rotational fallow in rainfed cereal-based production system is very common in the Mediterranean, including in the regions of Soria and Albacete where agricultural statistics (MAPA data) confirm that around 20% of the arable land is covered by fallow land. With the introduction of Greening through the CAP, the choice for rotational fallow as Ecological Focus Area (EFA) in this system was therefore by far the most frequently chosen (Díaz-Poblete et al, 2021). This aspect is important to keep in mind in our analysis because it implies that identifying unused lands that are unused for 1 year are very likely to be part of common rotational practices and/or allocated as EFA.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%