2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0533-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the incidence of brain tumors really increasing? A population-based analysis from a cancer registry

Abstract: Recently, an increasing incidence of brain tumors has been reported from multiple studies. Brain tumors diagnosed in the period 1985-2005 were identified through the Tuscan Cancer Registry, a population-based registry active since 1985 in the area of Florence and Prato. Age-standardized incidence rates and average annual percent change (APC) was calculated for the entire period from 1985 to 2005 for sex and behavior. A total of 4,417 brain tumors was registered, 1,900 (43%) in male and 2,517 (57%) in female pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, however, comparable to our rate of histologically verified tumours (35-59%) have been reported [2,16,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other studies, however, comparable to our rate of histologically verified tumours (35-59%) have been reported [2,16,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We suspect that the cause may be multifactorial. It should be noted, however, that a similar discrepancy was reported before between the incidence of malignant tumours in developed and developing countries [15], furthermore even in some European countries incidence rates of primary intracranial tumours in a range between 8.5-14 per 100,000 were reported [8,16,17]. The active case ascertainment method used in our study does not exclude influences of several factors, which may result in missing of brain tumours cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In contrast, histological verification rate is 69% in CBTRUS report and 80.9% in the ABTR data. In other studies, however, pathological confirmation index varied widely from 35% to 59% [11,15,16]. The percentage of histologically verified cases is one of the registry reliability indicators and efforts should be directed towards improving this value, which is less likely to reflect bias in reporting cancer cases (the index in our study is persistently low in both years – 38% and 33.5%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Some regional registries (for example in Spain, Italy, and France) have also provided useful data (6)(7)(8), but clinical and biological information are rarely investigated despite their clear relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%