Is the Incredible Years programme effective for children with neuro-developmental disorders and for families with Social Services involvement in the “real world” of community CAMHS?

Kleve, Liv; Crimlisk, Sue; Shoebridge, Philip; Greenwood, Rosemary; Baker, Bethan; Mead, Ben

doi:10.1177/1359104510366280

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current study, moreover, extends findings from the smaller clinical trials by reporting maintenance of treatment gains for ODD and improvements in certain functional domains (e.g., relationship with playmates or peers, overall severity of child problems and need for treatment) at 6-month follow-up. Such findings are also consistent with the maintenance of treatment effects from post-test to follow-up assessment periods for similar parent management training programs tested within routine clinic settings (e.g., Axberg and Broberg 2012; Behan et al 2001; Costin and Chambers 2007; Gardner et al 2006; Hagen et al, 2011; Hautmann et al 2009; Kleve et al 2010; Kling et al 2010; Kjobli and Ogden 2013; Larsson et al 2009; Ogden and Hagen 2008). …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

“…The current effectiveness study focuses on the extent to which a treatment can work in applied practice settings. In comparison to other effectiveness studies focused on treatment of youth with behavior disorders in community settings (Axberg and Broberg 2012; Behan et al 2001; Costin and Chambers 2007; Gardner et al 2006; Hagen et al 2011; Hautmann et al 2009; Kleve et al 2010; Kling et al 2010; Kjobli and Ogden 2013; Larsson et al 2009; Ogden and Hagen 2008), the current study is unique as it has been conducted within typical inner-city community child mental health clinics within the US with a predominantly low-income sample.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on the 6-month follow-up outcomes of an effectiveness study testing a multiple family group (MFG) intervention for clinic-referred youth (aged 7–11) with disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) and their families in socioeconomically disadvantaged families compared to services-as-usual (SAU) using a block comparison design. The settings were urban community-based outpatient mental health agencies. Clinic-based providers and family partner advocates facilitated the MFG intervention. Parent-report measures targeting child behavior, social skills, and impairment across functional domains (i.e., relationships with peers, parents, siblings, and academic progress) were assessed across four timepoints (baseline, mid-test, post-test, and 6-month follow-up) using mixed effects regression modeling. Compared to SAU participants, MFG participants reported significant improvement at 6-month follow-up in child behavior, impact of behavior on relationship with peers, and overall impairment/need for services. Findings indicate that MFG may provide longer-term benefits for youth with DBDs and their families in community-based settings. Implications within the context of a transforming healthcare system are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although poorer completion rates were reported in a sample with no exclusion criteria in which one third of the children had a clinically defined neuro-developmental disorder, it is noteworthy that in this high-needs sample over two thirds of parents who began the program completed it (Kleve et al, 2011).…”

Section: Disruptive Behavior Problemsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Does it work in the real world? The effectiveness of treatments for psychological problems in children and adolescents.

Lee

Horvath

Hunsley

2013

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the availability of hundreds of treatment studies in the scientific literature, we know little about whether these treatments work in regular practice. We present an updated review of treatment effectiveness studies for psychological problems in children and adolescents. A literature search yielded 20 recent articles describing effectiveness studies for the treatment of anxiety disorders, depression, and disruptive behavior problems. We compared data from these effectiveness studies with two benchmarks reported in meta-analyses of efficacy trials: the numbers of clients who completed services and the improvements found in those who completed services. All studies of the treatment of internalizing disorders reported completion rates above 80%; the majority of parenting interventions for the treatment of disruptive behavior problems reported that more than 75% of parents who began services completed them. The improvement rates reported in effectiveness studies for internalizing problems were comparable to the benchmarks reported in efficacy studies. There was greater variability in the treatment of disruptive behavior problems, with several studies outperforming the benchmark, and a smaller number yielding poorer results. Practitioners should be encouraged to see promising results that suggest evidence-based treatments for child and adolescent disorders can be effective when used in typical clinical settings.

show abstract

“…Several studies demonstrate positive outcomes following parent-training programs in the preschool age group (Lange et al, 2018;Rimestad, Lambek, Zacher Christiansen, & Hougaard, 2016;Webster-Stratton, Reid, & Beauchaine, 2011), but evidence for parent-training interventions in the management of ADHD in preadolescents is variable (Kleve et al, 2011;MTA Cooperative Group, 1999;Sayal et al, 2016;Stattin, Enebrink, Özdemir, & Giannotta, 2015;Zwi, Jones, Thorgaard, York, & Dennis, 2011). Several studies demonstrate positive outcomes following parent-training programs in the preschool age group (Lange et al, 2018;Rimestad, Lambek, Zacher Christiansen, & Hougaard, 2016;Webster-Stratton, Reid, & Beauchaine, 2011), but evidence for parent-training interventions in the management of ADHD in preadolescents is variable (Kleve et al, 2011;MTA Cooperative Group, 1999;Sayal et al, 2016;Stattin, Enebrink, Özdemir, & Giannotta, 2015;Zwi, Jones, Thorgaard, York, & Dennis, 2011).…”

Section: Parent-training Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents in Control: Parental perceptions of problem behaviors before and after attending an ADHD‐specific parent‐training program

Foubister

Rennie

Williams

2019

Child Adoles Psych Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problem: There is scant evidence to support the efficacy of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-specific parent-training programs in the treatment of preadolescent children with ADHD. This study explores the effectiveness of the Parents in Control (PINC) parent-training program, designed specifically for children with ADHD.Methods: In this pragmatic uncontrolled pre-poststudy parents of preadolescent children with a diagnosis of ADHD were invited to attend the 6-week PINC course.Fifty-seven parent-report pre/postprogram questionnaires were completed.Findings: Parental ratings of the intensity and frequency of problem behaviors after completing PINC showed a significant reduction (p < .001) with a moderate effect size (0.6-0.7).Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the efficacy of PINC in reducing the parental perception of problem behaviors and support a need for further rigorous randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluation of this ADHD-specific intervention.

show abstract

Is the Incredible Years programme effective for children with neuro-developmental disorders and for families with Social Services involvement in the “real world” of community CAMHS?

Abstract: The results are comparable to other effectiveness studies (e.g., Gardner, Barton, & Klimes, 2006; Scott, 2005). They also show that the IY is equally effective for children diagnosed with a neuro-developmental disorder and for families with multiple and complex needs.

Cited by 18 publications

References 24 publications

Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up

Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up

Does it work in the real world? The effectiveness of treatments for psychological problems in children and adolescents.

Parents in Control: Parental perceptions of problem behaviors before and after attending an ADHD‐specific parent‐training program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About