2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Lingual Fracture Line Influenced by the Mandibular Canal or the Mylohyoid Groove During a Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Human Cadaveric Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…performed conventional BSSO using sagittal splitters and separators in cadaveric mandibles 17 and reported that 72.5% lingual fractures ended in the mandibular foramen; this value was 75% in our study. Other aspects of the splits were also roughly similar.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…performed conventional BSSO using sagittal splitters and separators in cadaveric mandibles 17 and reported that 72.5% lingual fractures ended in the mandibular foramen; this value was 75% in our study. Other aspects of the splits were also roughly similar.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Other aspects of the splits were also roughly similar. Mensink et al 17 also reported a reliable splitting pattern after BSSO using sagittal splitters and separators, without an increased risk of bad splits, which was confirmed by clinical studies. 13,18 The conventional osteotomy design has been used since 1968.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The mandibular lingula limits the foramen medially (Alves and Deana, ), and is the attachment of the sphenomandibular ligament, clinically important for oral and maxillofacial surgeons during saggital split ramus osteotomy as a landmark for avoiding nerve injury, hemorrhage and unfavorable fractures (Jansisyanont et al, ). There is a shallow groove (or sometimes a partial canal, or a small bone bridging) located posterior to the lingula called the mylohyoid groove (Narayana et al, ; Mensink et al, ), in which the mylohyoid nerve, a small branch of the inferior alveolar nerve, penetrates. There are many variations of this groove, and Fabian () concluded that the sphenomandibular ligament on the lingula and/or medial wall of the mandibular foramen leads to variations in its location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Previous studies in cadavers have measured the anatomical configurations of key mandibular structures and their implications on surgical complications. 20,21 Actually CT scans can provide a reliable information and precise linear measurements 22 and a comparative study presented that the difference between real value and tomographic value is <0.1 mm in 81% of cases. 23 Previous studies just considering the thickness of the cortical bone found results ranging from 1.59 to 3,03 mm, 24 which is not safe for the clinical application of current fixation systems, where the minimum length of the screws is 4 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%