2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Mallampati Score Useful for Emergency Department Airway Management or Procedural Sedation?

Abstract: We review the literature in regard to the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility of the Mallampati score as might be pertinent and applicable to emergency department (ED) airway management and procedural sedation. This 4-level pictorial tool was devised to predict difficult preoperative laryngoscopy and intubation, but is now also widely recommended as a routine screening element before procedural sedation. The literature evidence demonstrates that the Mallampati score is inadequately sensitive for the identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
8
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
8
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mallampati score, a classical measure of pre-anesthesia assessment, did not differ signi cantly in the AE and non-AE groups. This nding was in agreement with studies showing that Mallampati score did not signi cantly predict the occurrence of AEs in pediatric patients undergoing sedation [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Mallampati score, a classical measure of pre-anesthesia assessment, did not differ signi cantly in the AE and non-AE groups. This nding was in agreement with studies showing that Mallampati score did not signi cantly predict the occurrence of AEs in pediatric patients undergoing sedation [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Mallampati score, however, is di cult to assess objectively, as independent observers commonly grade these scores differently [30], with its reliability being especially low in patients aged <3 years [31]. The median (IQR) age of patients in the present study was 2.7 (11.1-4.8) years, suggesting a lower association between Mallampati score and AEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A classic example described in the literature is the Mallampati classification, which assigns a score from I to IV. Type I have less and type IV has greater difficulty in intubation based on the visualization of anatomical structures [8]. The patient had Mallampati III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Mallampati's score lacks the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility required to supplement a standard airway evaluation. 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It cannot be evaluated in many young children and in patients who cannot cooperate because of their underlying medical condition. The Mallampati's score lacks the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility required to supplement a standard airway evaluation 17.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%