The resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin Cry2Ab in a greenhouse-originated Trichoplusia ni strain resistant to both Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab was characterized. Biological assays determined that the Cry2Ab resistance in the T. ni strain was a monogenic recessive trait independent of Cry1Ac resistance, and there existed no significant cross-resistance between Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in T. ni. From the dual-toxin-resistant T. ni strain, a strain resistant to Cry2Ab only was isolated, and the Cry2Ab resistance trait was introgressed into a susceptible laboratory strain to facilitate comparative analysis of the Cry2Ab resistance with the susceptible T. ni strain. Results from biochemical analysis showed no significant difference between the Cry2Ab-resistant and -susceptible T. ni larvae in midgut proteases, including caseinolytic proteolytic activity and zymogram profile and serine protease activities, in midgut aminopeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activity, and in midgut esterases and hemolymph plasma melanization activity. For analysis of genetic linkage of Cry2Ab resistance with potential Cry toxin receptor genes, molecular markers for the midgut cadherin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and aminopeptidase N (APN) genes were identified between the original greenhouse-derived dual-toxin-resistant and the susceptible laboratory T. ni strains. Genetic linkage analysis showed that the Cry2Ab resistance in T. ni was not genetically associated with the midgut genes coding for the cadherin, ALP, and 6 APNs (APN1 to APN6) nor associated with the ABC transporter gene ABCC2. Therefore, the Cry2Ab resistance in T. ni is conferred by a novel but unknown genetic mechanism.T he Gram-positive soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been widely used as a microbial insecticide in sprayable formulations, and Bt toxins are the primary insecticidal proteins expressed in genetically engineered crops to confer insect resistance (1; ISAAA's GM Approval Database, http://www.isaaa.org /gmapprovaldatabase/). Since the mid-1990s, insect-resistant Bt crops have been rapidly adopted with proven economic and environmental benefits (2, 3). However, development of insect resistance to Bt toxins threatens the long-term success of application of Bt toxins for insect pest control. The genetic potential of insect populations to evolve Bt resistance has been well shown in laboratory selections, and cases of insect resistance to Bt formulations and Bt crops have occurred in insect populations under selection pressure by Bt sprays and Bt crops in the field (4-8).Studies of insect resistance to Bt toxins have so far been mostly on Lepidoptera pests to the toxin Cry1Ab or Cry1Ac (9-19), the two major Bt Cry toxins which are highly toxic to Lepidoptera pests and known to share the same binding sites in target insects (4, 20). Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac are the primary insecticidal proteins expressed in the current commercial transgenic Bt maize and Bt cotton varieties to target Lepidoptera pests in the field (21). Resistance to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ab ...