2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.14505
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the mm/submm dust polarization a robust tracer of the magnetic field topology in protostellar envelopes? A model exploration

Abstract: Context. High resolution (sub-) millimeter polarization observations have opened a new era in the understanding of how magnetic fields are organized in star forming regions, unveiling an intricate interplay between the magnetic fields and the gas in protostellar cores. However, to assess the role of the magnetic field in the process of solar-type star formation, it is key to be able to understand to what extent these polarized dust emission are good tracers of the magnetic field in the youngest protostellar ob… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When focusing on the smaller envelope radii < 500 au, where the magnetic field lines are more likely perturbed from the initially smooth configuration by infall and outflow and opacity effects kick in, 75% of the lines of sight still give robust results. Finally, Valdivia et al (2022) and Le find that the polarization fraction is correlated to the degree of organization of the magnetic field along the line-of-sight, confirming that the behavior observed at larger scales, in less dense gas, holds true down to the scales of the envelopes of protostars. Le find that the dust alignment efficiency does not significantly vary with local gas density in their observations, and that the synthetic maps only can reproduce the observed polarimetric data when significant irradiation from the central protostar is included.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When focusing on the smaller envelope radii < 500 au, where the magnetic field lines are more likely perturbed from the initially smooth configuration by infall and outflow and opacity effects kick in, 75% of the lines of sight still give robust results. Finally, Valdivia et al (2022) and Le find that the polarization fraction is correlated to the degree of organization of the magnetic field along the line-of-sight, confirming that the behavior observed at larger scales, in less dense gas, holds true down to the scales of the envelopes of protostars. Le find that the dust alignment efficiency does not significantly vary with local gas density in their observations, and that the synthetic maps only can reproduce the observed polarimetric data when significant irradiation from the central protostar is included.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Their work analyses result in synthetic polarized dust emission maps, which are compared to the true B-field properties in the models and to observations. Valdivia et al (2022) show that measurements of the line-of-sight averaged magnetic field line orientation using the polarized dust emission are precise enough to recover the mean field lines distribution with accuracy < 15deg (typical of the error on polarization angles obtained with observations from large mm polarimetric facilities such as ALMA) in about 95% of the independent lines of sight peering through protostellar envelopes at all radii. When focusing on the smaller envelope radii < 500 au, where the magnetic field lines are more likely perturbed from the initially smooth configuration by infall and outflow and opacity effects kick in, 75% of the lines of sight still give robust results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extensive efforts have been done to model and interpret submillimeter dust polarization from protostellar environments (see, e.g., Valdivia et al 2022). Nevertheless, previous studies usually make simplified assumptions on grain alignment physics for modeling dust polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%