2011
DOI: 10.1177/0095798410394177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Moratorium Over? African American Psychology Professionals’ Views on Intelligence Testing in Response to Changes to Federal Policy

Abstract: Collectively, advocates for the well-being of African American children have long called for a moratorium on the use of intelligence testing for the placement of children in special education. With the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, intelligence testing is no longer required and in some states prohibited as a tool for assessing learning disabilities. As such, the purpose of this descriptive study is to give an overview of these changes and how they will affect the asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, overrepresentation of Black children in special education continues to be a major issue in school psychology (Graves and Mitchell 2011;Connor 2017;Morgan et al 2017). School psychologists play an integral role given that they select the tests to administer, compose the reports from which decisions are made, and are perceived as the professional with the most extensive assessment training (Sotelo-Dynega and Dixon 2014; Dombrowski 2015; Maki et al 2015).…”
Section: Issues Regarding the Assessment Of Black Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, overrepresentation of Black children in special education continues to be a major issue in school psychology (Graves and Mitchell 2011;Connor 2017;Morgan et al 2017). School psychologists play an integral role given that they select the tests to administer, compose the reports from which decisions are made, and are perceived as the professional with the most extensive assessment training (Sotelo-Dynega and Dixon 2014; Dombrowski 2015; Maki et al 2015).…”
Section: Issues Regarding the Assessment Of Black Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTI model of service provision has been discussed as a potential remedy for the overrepresentation of children of color in special education because it involves less reliance on IQ‐discrepancy models of assessment (Proctor, Graves, & Esch, ). However, more research is needed to see if RTI methodology reduces placement rates and if they are sufficient for special education placement (Graves & Mitchell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While individuals may interchange the terms learning disability and intellectual disability, the two categories are quite different. A specific learning disability (SLD) is a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or to do mathematical calculations (Graves & Mitchell, 2011).…”
Section: Differences Between Learning Disabilities and Intellectual Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there is a documented the overreliance of IQ testing as the sole indicator in the diagnosis and classification of mental retardation (Lecavalier, Tassé, & Lévesque, 2002). While this may be the case, relying on the ability-achievement discrepancy model as the exclusive means of identifying children with specific learning disabilities is at odds with best practice (Graves & Mitchell, 2011). Best practices in the assessment service delivery to children identified as having a SLD should be based on the outcomes of high-quality and research-based instruction.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%