Is the Pampean flat-slab responsible for the differences in post-seismic motions between Maule and Illapel earthquakes?

Abstract

<p>Ever since the Maule earthquake (Mw8.8, 2010), a quick vertical uplift is measured thanks to GNSS in the Andes, facing the rupture zone (~250 km to the trench). Models built for the Maule earthquake [Klein et al. 2016] have highlighted that a low-viscosity channel is required to explain the post-seismic uplift. This channel is located along the slab between 50 km and 130 km depth and has a viscosity of a few 10<sup>17</sup> Pa.s - lower than in the asthenosphere, 10<sup>18</sup> Pa.s. </p> <p>After the Illapel earthquake (Mw8.3, 2015), simple observations on GNSS time-series show that no uplift occurred in the Andes at an equivalent distance to the trench than in the case of the Maule earthquake. The subduction in the Illapel region is characterized by a flat-slab (called the Pampean flat-slab) in contrast with the normal-dipping subduction in the region of Maule.</p> <p>Here, we investigate what is the impact of the Pampean flat-slab on the post-seismic deformations of the Illapel earthquake. In particular, we try to understand  whether the presence of the flat-slab inhibits the effect of the low-viscosity channel. For that purpose we compare GNSS vertical displacements with predictions in both regions of Maule and Illapel from a 3D spherical finite-element model that accounts for the slab geometry of the Chilean subduction zone.</p>