Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Fehrenbach, Julia; Isolan, Cristina Pereira; Münchow, Eliseu Aldrighi

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.014

Cited by 57 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 187 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…is way, there is a double bonding mechanism, and this chemical interaction with the dental substrate results in greater bond strength when compared to only micromechanical adhesion [7,40,41]. e findings of the present study are in line with those of a systematic review of in vitro studies [42], which indicated that adhesives containing 10-MDP had superior bonding performance in comparison with materials formulated with other acidic ingredients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP

Oliveira

Paula

Ribeiro

et al. 2022

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the bond strength of self-etching adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers. Twenty-four bovine teeth were divided into three groups. Two cylinders of composite resin were made in each tooth (n = 16): G1-Prime and Bond Universal (control); G2-OptiBond All-in-One (HEMA); and G3-Clearfil SE (10-MDP and HEMA). After 24-hour storage in distilled water, the specimens were fixed to a universal testing machine (Kratos Equipamentos Ltda.) for the microshear test at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. A qualitative analysis of the fracture pattern was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (500× magnification). The normality of sample data distribution was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and α level of 5% was used for the analysis. The results indicated a statistical difference ( p > 0.05 ) between G3 (15.6080 MPa) and G2 (11.2180 MPa). No statistical difference was observed when G1 (14,6325 MPa) was compared with the other two groups. It was also observed that a mixed fracture pattern was predominant in all groups. The self-etching adhesive containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers showed to be promising in increasing the bond strength between the dental substrate and the composite resin, whereas the adhesive containing only HEMA exhibited lower bond strength to dentin.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP

Oliveira

Paula

Ribeiro

et al. 2022

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, we can mention that the success of dental bonding with the use of adhesive systems containing 10-MDP depends on the type of mechanical test, the type of substrate, the monomer concentration, the surface pretreatment and the working times (39)(40)(41)(42). The limitations of the present study include the lack of a control group represented by healthy enamel samples.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Bond Strength Comparison Among 10-MDP-Containing and Non-10-MDP-Containing Adhesives in Different Degrees of Dental Fluorosis

Solís-Martínez

Valles-Flores

Chávez

et al. 2022

Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental fluorosis can cause changes in the enamel surface, conditioning its functionality and esthetics. The application of dental adhesives is a treatment option; however, their use on fluorotic teeth can result in limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of two different adhesives, one with 10-MDP and one without 10-MDP, in different degrees of dental fluorosis.This is an in vitro study on dental enamel samples, a total of 180 samples with the inclusion criteria were treated, randomly divided into two groups of 90, according to the type of dental adhesive, where each group was again divided into three groups of 30 samples, representing different degrees of dental fluorosis according to the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (Group I: TF1 and TF2; Group II: TF3; Group III: TF4). Normality tests, two-factor ANOVA, and post-hoc tests were used to determine differences between the groups, with a significance level of 95%. As results, a statistically significant difference was shown between the use of dental adhesive with 10-MDP and the three groups of dental fluorosis (p=0.011), in addition, a Tukey post-hoc test on the groups treated with 10-MDP adhesive revealed a statistically significant difference between group I versus group II, and group I versus group III, (p=<0.05). It is concluded that the use of adhesive systems with 10-MDP presents a better shear bond strength on enamel with dental fluorosis grades I and II in the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index.

show abstract

“…Clearfil S3 Bond includes 10‐MDP. The adhesion‐decalcification concept explains that this functional monomer can ionically react with hydroxyapatite (HAp), which forms self‐assembled “nano‐layers.” Stable MDP‐Ca salt deposition along with nano‐layering make the adhesive interface more resistant to biodegradation and may elucidate the high stability of MDP‐based bonding 53,54 . Manufacturers claimed that the Clearfil S3 Bond formulation included “Molecular Dispersion Technology”, and this allowed hydrophilic and hydrophobic components to be homogeneously combined.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stable MDP-Ca salt deposition along with nano-layering make the adhesive interface more resistant to biodegradation and may elucidate the high stability of MDP-based bonding. 53,54 Manufacturers claimed that the Clearfil S3 Bond formulation included "Molecular Dispersion Technology", and this allowed hydrophilic and hydrophobic components to be homogeneously combined. Thus, there is no phase separation, leading to the formation of a homogenous layer on the preparation surface with no water voids and excellent bond performance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Demırcı

Tuncer

Tekçe

et al. 2022

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of a 1-step self-etch dentin adhesive that was applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, doubling the adhesive application time and layer in Class I cavities with a composite resin.Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients aged between 14 and 43 (mean age:19.1) years were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three restorations. In these three restorations, a 1-step self-etch adhesive was applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations (control group), by doubling the adhesive application time, and with double layers. The restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria at baseline, and 1, 2, 3, and 4-year recalls.Results: After 4 years, the success rate was 100% for restorations with the adhesive applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, 96.9% for restorations applied by doubling the adhesive application time, and 93.8% for restorations applied with double adhesive layers. There was no significant difference between the three application methods among all the evaluation periods regarding the evaluation criteria. Conclusions:The 4-year success rates of a 1-step self-etch dentin adhesive that was applied according to the manufacturers' recommendation, by doubling the adhesive application time, and with double layers were excellent.Clinical Significance: It is not recommended to double the adhesive application time nor apply a double layer of a 1-step self-etch adhesive because it does not improve the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations.

show abstract

Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Cited by 57 publications

References 187 publications

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP

Bond Strength Comparison Among 10-MDP-Containing and Non-10-MDP-Containing Adhesives in Different Degrees of Dental Fluorosis

The effect of different application modes of a 1‐step self‐etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About