2015
DOI: 10.5830/cvja-2014-054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the relationship of body mass index to severity of coronary artery disease different from that of waist-to-hip ratio and severity of coronary artery disease? Paradoxical findings : cardiovascular topic

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundAlthough for decades there has been controversy regarding the relationship between obesity and coronary artery disease (CAD), it has been assumed that high body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for CAD. However, the findings of some recent studies were paradoxical.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to find a relationship between high BMI and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with severity of CAD.MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional, prospective study where 414 patients with suspected coronary arte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
17
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the WHR was found to be more strong predictor of the severity of CAD. This result was comparable with the study of Parsa and Jahanshahi 21 .…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus the WHR was found to be more strong predictor of the severity of CAD. This result was comparable with the study of Parsa and Jahanshahi 21 .…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean WHR was found 0.96±0.07 and 0.88±0.05 in moderate to severe and normal to mild CAD respectively and was statistically significant (p=<0.001). Similar finding was evaluated by Parsa and Jahanshahi 21 .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have suggested obesity as a protective factor for CAD, the so-called obesity paradox. 14 Nevertheless, such paradox is not concerned to abdominal obesity, which has been associated with CAD and considered more pathological than subcutaneous fat accumulation. 14 - 16 In our study, we did not measure abdominal circumference, which may have influenced the consistency of results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study Parsa and Jahanshahi. 16 found the prevalence of cigarette smoking, HTN, DM, hyperlipidemia, and family history of CAD were 45.8%, 39.1%, 27.3%, 29.5%, and 26.3% respectively. These differences might be due to variation in the life style, degree of motivation and level of education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%