2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Rigidity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Motif the Hallmark for Its Enhanced Infectivity? Insights from All-Atom Simulations

Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is setting the global health crisis of our time, causing a devastating societal and economic burden. An idiosyncratic trait of coronaviruses is the presence of spike glycoproteins on the viral envelope, which mediate the virus binding to specific host receptor, enabling its entry into the human cells. In spite of the high sequence identity of SARS-CoV-2 with its closely related SARS-CoV emerged in 2002, the atomic-level determinants underl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

33
240
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
33
240
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further SuMD replica reproduced the complex with good agreement to the cryo-EM structure ( Figure S6a), while other two simulations were not productive after 230 ns ( Figure S6b,c). SuMD reproduced the stability and intermolecular contacts observed between the RBD and ACE2 during MD of the PDB structure 6M17 (Figure 3a,b), highlighting RBD site 1 residues T500, Y505, N501, and Q498 as the most involved in interactions alongside Q493, L455, K417 (site 2) and F486 (site 3) [5,60,63].…”
Section: Cefsulodin Cromoglycate Nafamostat Nilotinib Pen Uridol mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A further SuMD replica reproduced the complex with good agreement to the cryo-EM structure ( Figure S6a), while other two simulations were not productive after 230 ns ( Figure S6b,c). SuMD reproduced the stability and intermolecular contacts observed between the RBD and ACE2 during MD of the PDB structure 6M17 (Figure 3a,b), highlighting RBD site 1 residues T500, Y505, N501, and Q498 as the most involved in interactions alongside Q493, L455, K417 (site 2) and F486 (site 3) [5,60,63].…”
Section: Cefsulodin Cromoglycate Nafamostat Nilotinib Pen Uridol mentioning
confidence: 58%
“… 17 Molecular modeling and simulation studies have also been performed to rationalize, at the atomistic level, the behavior of the different involved proteins, 18 the pattern of interactions between them and other biological structures such as nucleic acids, 19 and the inherent differences between the SARS-CoV-2 proteome and those of other coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV or the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) agents. 20 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Smith et al [7] have scanned thousands of ligands with molecular dynamics simulations of the RBD, and have ranked these ligands based on their affinity. Other studies have focused their attention on quantifying the S-protein/ACE2 receptor's formation energy, using a full trimeric model and/or a single Sprotein/ACE2 receptor [8][9][10][11]. While these studies provide useful information on the compound's formation energy, they failed in predicting realistic interaction energies that can be indirectly contrasted with experimental measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%