2018
DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.07.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging indicated in patients with scoliosis?

Abstract: Background: To assess the reliability of the indicators for performing magnetic resonance imaging in patients with scoliosis and assess the incidence of neural axis anomalies in a population with scoliosis referred to a specialist centre.Methods: A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports of all patients under the age of 18 who underwent a pre-operative MRI for investigation of their scoliosis between 2009 and 2014 at a single institution was performed.Results: There were 851 patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, radiologists frequently report abnormalities on MRI that are routinely ignored by the treating surgeon or deemed clinically inconsequential (58% of reported abnormalities in our cohort). This clinical reality has been noted by others, 6,9,15,21 including the lack of correlation between reported facet abnormality/effusion, in the absence of supporting clinical manipulative challenge of the abnormal region. 22,23 Therefore, treating surgeons should be aware, and patient/families educated to the likelihood of clinically inconsequential abnormalities in radiologists’ formal reports of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, radiologists frequently report abnormalities on MRI that are routinely ignored by the treating surgeon or deemed clinically inconsequential (58% of reported abnormalities in our cohort). This clinical reality has been noted by others, 6,9,15,21 including the lack of correlation between reported facet abnormality/effusion, in the absence of supporting clinical manipulative challenge of the abnormal region. 22,23 Therefore, treating surgeons should be aware, and patient/families educated to the likelihood of clinically inconsequential abnormalities in radiologists’ formal reports of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[ 3 ] The right convex thoracic with or without left lumbar curve is usually accepted the typical curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and left thoracic, particularly in males, is accepted as the atypical curve pattern. [ 19 , 20 ] Further investigation is needed for an atypical curve (e.g., a curve less than six segments [a short curve], kyphosis near to curve’s apex, decreased rotation of apex, and rapid progression) and sclerosis or osseous destruction (e.g., an infection or underlying tumor). [ 20 , 21 ] Unfortunately, intraspinal problems (e.g., syrinx or tethered cord) occasionally show the same curve pattern as typical scoliosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is standard care for this group in this institution, all patients had both radiographs and surface topography imaging at each planned attendance to the hospital. Also, it is the protocol of the hospital that all patients with AIS undergo an MRI scan (unless contra-indicated) of the whole spine and neural axis to confirm the diagnosis of AIS and rule out any intra-dural anomalies that could be associated with scoliosis (19,20). As part of this imaging, axial slices of the apex of the deformity are a routine imaging series, specifically performed to look for the presence of a syrinx in the spinal cord at the apex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%