1974
DOI: 10.1785/bssa0640051363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?

Abstract: Yes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
359
0
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,371 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
359
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method is more straightforward than that of [10], because it does not require a sophisticated stochastic declustering procedure [12]. Still, it only needs to identify the events in a seismic sequence, in this work made with the classical [16] declustering algorithm. Despite its simplicity, our method gives encouraging good results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method is more straightforward than that of [10], because it does not require a sophisticated stochastic declustering procedure [12]. Still, it only needs to identify the events in a seismic sequence, in this work made with the classical [16] declustering algorithm. Despite its simplicity, our method gives encouraging good results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epicenter distribution of these events is shown in Figure 1. The current seismic sequences present in the seismic catalog have been detected by the [16] declustering algorithm, and the related parameters are provided and implemented in the ZMAP software [17]. Figure 2 shows the mainshocks (red dots) and foreshocks/aftershocks (blue dots) in three zones in the world (Chile, Mexico, and Indonesia).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tried to decluster the seismic event using different algorithm excluding aftershocks and foreshocks. Gardner and Knopoff (1974) designed a window based method for declustering in which they proposed that aftershocks located as succeeding shocks within specified distance and particular time interval. Same as in the case of foreshocks, succeeding foreshocks generate a large magnitude earthquake that will be treated as large aftershocks.…”
Section: Window Methods For Declusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual rate of seismicity of any region is based on the earthquake catalogue and number of earthquakes per year can be estimates using frequency magnitude relation (Gutenberg Richter law) associated with their a and b-values of specific region (Gutenberg and Richter, 1954, 1956a, 1956b. Different researchers proposed different procedures for declustering of earthquake catalogues (Knopoff and Gadner, 1972;Gardner and Knopoff, 1974;Reasenberg, 1985;Uhrhammer, 1986;Grunthal et al, 2009;Wiemer, 2001). A comprehensive detailed catalogue is the key to interpret the earthquake activity rate and analysis of occurrence and reoccurrence in the form of time series (Gupta et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It spans a longer time period (till the end 2016) with a revised set of earthquakes, locations, and magnitude values. It includes only mainshocks recognized using the distance-and time-windowing declustering scheme of Gardner and Knopoff (1974). The present analysis was carried out for 63 mainshocks having the magnitude/time distribution shown in Figure 2B.…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%