2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.127.091602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Standard Model in the Swampland? Consistency Requirements from Gravitational Scattering

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and all 2d modes whose effective masses are H satisfy the rotating version of the FL bound (although a mass of order Hubble means the corresponding field is close to saturating 7 This is reminiscent of the proposed bound Λ EFT ≤ √ gmMP for pure QED in [33,34]. In this case too the charge carriers provide a (much stronger) upper bound on the EFT cut-off scale, albeit stemming from non-trivial assumptions about the scattering amplitudes.…”
Section: Rotating Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and all 2d modes whose effective masses are H satisfy the rotating version of the FL bound (although a mass of order Hubble means the corresponding field is close to saturating 7 This is reminiscent of the proposed bound Λ EFT ≤ √ gmMP for pure QED in [33,34]. In this case too the charge carriers provide a (much stronger) upper bound on the EFT cut-off scale, albeit stemming from non-trivial assumptions about the scattering amplitudes.…”
Section: Rotating Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this case too the charge carriers provide a (much stronger) upper bound on the EFT cut-off scale, albeit stemming from non-trivial assumptions about the scattering amplitudes. Note that the cut-off in [34] is dependent on the complete particle spectrum of the theory and is for instance heavily modified going from QED to electroweak theory.…”
Section: Rotating Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, the bounds must be satisfied up to the inclusion of gravitational UV effects, which are typically beyond the range of application of the EFT, but which can violate a strict positivity condition. Positivity bounds in the presence of gravity have been used to study the coupling of matter to gravitation in several models [60][61][62][63], but their application to modified gravity has been mostly restricted to cases were dynamical gravitons are either neglected [64][65][66][67][68] or massive [69,70].…”
Section: Jhep03(2022)075mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it may be at (10 3 − 10 4 ) GeV [34,35] or (10 14 − 10 16 ) GeV [36] or (0.7 − 1.6)10 15 GeV [37] or (10 13 − 10 15 ) GeV [38]. In this study, we use the cut-off scale Λ ∼ 10 14 GeV [39] and assume that the VEV of singlets are at a very high energy scale:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%