2003
DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200301000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Theory of Planned Behavior a Useful Framework for Understanding Exercise Adherence During Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation?

Abstract: Results of the present study provide evidence that the TPB is a useful framework for understanding exercise intentions and adherence during phase II CR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
68
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to current behavior, the intention to engage in regular physical activities was the only variable associated to the outcome, consistently with other studies among cardiac patients 13,18 . However, in the study by Johnston et al 19 , the only predictor of the behavior was the perceived behavioral control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With respect to current behavior, the intention to engage in regular physical activities was the only variable associated to the outcome, consistently with other studies among cardiac patients 13,18 . However, in the study by Johnston et al 19 , the only predictor of the behavior was the perceived behavioral control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This theoretical model originated the analysis model used in the present study which was important during multivariable analysis 17 . On that account, this is one of the few studies using such theoretical model with this population 13,[18][19] and developed out of cardiac rehabilitation programs 13,19 . Besides, it adds up to the scarce literature on the theme 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other than distance/travel time and rurality status, the following barriers were often self-reported: heavy traffic (Stokes 2008), parking problems, inconvenient program locations (Grace et al 2002), cost of traveling, not having a driver's license or inability to drive (Dunlay et al 2009, Winberg 2002, Jones et al 2007, Dalal, Evans 2003, Wingham et al 2006, and inclement weather leading to hazardous or congested traffic conditions (Blanchard et al 2003, Fleury et al 2004). Indeed, for rural patients, factors other than proximity to a program may influence attendance, such as the quality of roads and harsh weather in particular for northern-residing outpatients (Curnier, Savage & Ades 2005, Pell, Morrison 1998).…”
Section: Other Geographic Barriers To Cr Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dropout rates have ranged from 10 to 36% and many patientsÕ exercise adherence levels decline even further once they have completed their programme. 10 Geographical and transportation barriers, socio-economic factors and financial constraints might be important determinants of this non-adherence. 11 Therefore, it is important to look for alternative models of health service delivery that could better meet patientsÕ preferences and, in so doing, enhance exercise treatment compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%