2015
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a benefit in computed tomography screening for cancer in patients with unprovoked proximal deep venous thrombosis? A cohort study in the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Similarly, in a UK-based retrospective single-center study incorporating results from 62 CT scans carried out in the setting of unprovoked VTE, only 1 incidental cancer was detected (early urothelial carcinoma of the bladder), but 28 of these scans identified other incidental findings, which necessitated extensive follow-up investigations. 22,23 In another similar study consisting of results from 23 CT scans undertaken for the purposes of cancer screening, no cancers were detected but 5 individuals required further investigations based on the initial CT results. 23 Interestingly, a recent post hoc analysis of outcomes in specific subgroups of patients studied in the SOME trial suggests that age greater than 60 years, a previous diagnosis of provoked VTE, or a smoking history may be associated with an increased risk of occult malignancy in patients presenting with unprovoked VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Similarly, in a UK-based retrospective single-center study incorporating results from 62 CT scans carried out in the setting of unprovoked VTE, only 1 incidental cancer was detected (early urothelial carcinoma of the bladder), but 28 of these scans identified other incidental findings, which necessitated extensive follow-up investigations. 22,23 In another similar study consisting of results from 23 CT scans undertaken for the purposes of cancer screening, no cancers were detected but 5 individuals required further investigations based on the initial CT results. 23 Interestingly, a recent post hoc analysis of outcomes in specific subgroups of patients studied in the SOME trial suggests that age greater than 60 years, a previous diagnosis of provoked VTE, or a smoking history may be associated with an increased risk of occult malignancy in patients presenting with unprovoked VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A UK‐based retrospective single‐center evaluated 62 CT scans obtained in the setting of unprovoked VTE. With the imaging results, researchers were only able to identify one incidental cancer (early urothelial carcinoma of the bladder) 31 . However, 28 of these scans identified other incidental abnormalities, which necessitated extensive follow‐up investigations 31 .…”
Section: Benefit Of Enhanced Testing For Occult Malignancy In Unprovo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the imaging results, researchers were only able to identify one incidental cancer (early urothelial carcinoma of the bladder) 31 . However, 28 of these scans identified other incidental abnormalities, which necessitated extensive follow‐up investigations 31 . Another retrospective review of all ambulatory patients diagnosed with VTE in a London hospital, followed 239 patients after unprovoked VTE over a 24‐month period.…”
Section: Benefit Of Enhanced Testing For Occult Malignancy In Unprovo...mentioning
confidence: 99%