2002
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Curse of Dimensionality for Contraction Fixed Points in the Worst Case?

Abstract: This paper analyzes the complexity of the contraction fixed point problem: compute an ε-approximation to the fixed point V * = Γ(V * ) of a contraction mapping Γ that maps a Banach space B d of continuous functions of d variables into itself. We focus on quasi linear contractions where Γ is a nonlinear functional of a finite number of conditional expectation operators. This class includes contractive Fredholm integral equations that arise in asset pricing applications and the contractive Bellman equation from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first note that the smoothed Bellman operator has a unique fixed point. Rust, Traub, and Wozniakowski (2002) show that the additivity of the social surplus makes the smooth Bellman operator "quasilinear" and this is used to prove that is a contraction. Second, we show that if P is a fixed point of , then P is a fixed point of .…”
Section: Appendix: Proofs Of Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first note that the smoothed Bellman operator has a unique fixed point. Rust, Traub, and Wozniakowski (2002) show that the additivity of the social surplus makes the smooth Bellman operator "quasilinear" and this is used to prove that is a contraction. Second, we show that if P is a fixed point of , then P is a fixed point of .…”
Section: Appendix: Proofs Of Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we describe recent theoretical work on these issues. Rust (1997) and Rust et al (2002) are two recent papers that prove that the curse of dimensionality is a problem for large classes of dynamic programming problems. However, before one becomes too pessimistic about solving high-dimensional dynamic programming problems, he should remember how the curse of dimensionality is defined.…”
Section: Theoretical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then a quite natural consequence to use iterations to arrive at equilibrium, because fixed-point problems are usually solved using a contraction argument and iterating the fixedpoint equation an infinite number of times (Rust, Traub, and Wozniakowski 2002). This iteration technique sets two kinds of questions, questions of the interpretation of the iterations and also of the uniqueness of solutions.…”
Section: Thierry Magnacmentioning
confidence: 99%