2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-2046-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a difference in head posture and cervical spine movement in children with and without pediatric headache?

Abstract: Pediatric headache is an increasingly reported phenomenon. Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a subgroup of headache, but there is limited information about cervical spine physical examination signs in children with CGH. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was designed to investigate cervical spine physical examination signs including active range of motion (ROM), posture determined by the craniovertebral angle (CVA), and upper cervical ROM determined by the flexion-rotation test (FRT) in children aged between 6 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the reduction of craniocervical ROM has been described as a characteristic of several musculoskeletal and neurological diseases. Thus, cervicogenic headache in children determines reduced flexion, extension, and lateroflexion, although not rotational movements [64], plagiocephaly limits cervical ROM, especially in the rotational plane [65], and congenital muscular torticollis reduces ROM in frontal and transversal planes [66]. In conclusion, specific craniocervical ROM is not a characteristic of CP in children, at least when muscle tone is slightly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the contrary, the reduction of craniocervical ROM has been described as a characteristic of several musculoskeletal and neurological diseases. Thus, cervicogenic headache in children determines reduced flexion, extension, and lateroflexion, although not rotational movements [64], plagiocephaly limits cervical ROM, especially in the rotational plane [65], and congenital muscular torticollis reduces ROM in frontal and transversal planes [66]. In conclusion, specific craniocervical ROM is not a characteristic of CP in children, at least when muscle tone is slightly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When at least one of these tests indicates reduced passive ROM, UCD is clinically diagnosed and, dependent on the direction of reduced mobility, treated with specific techniques [5]. To date, research has acknowledged good reliability of the FRT in adults [10][11][12][13] and children [14] while in infants only one study examined the intrarater reliability; one rater examined infants with torticollis and found high intra-rater reliability (ICC: ≥0.77) [15]. Even though the validity and reliability of the FRT and LFT in infants are still largely unknown, manual therapists currently use these tests in their diagnostic clinical decision-making [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei der Inspektion und Observation von HWS und Kopf ist v. a. auf eine nach vorne geschobene Kopfposition zu achten. Der aus einer Anteroposition resultierende verkleinerte CVA kann im Zusammenhang mit Kopfschmerzen stehen [26]. Der CVA wird mittels Goniometer oder digitaler Klinimetrie bestimmt (▶ Abb.…”
Section: Inspektion Und Palpationunclassified
“…Bei den Kindern mit Kopfschmerzen zeigte sich ein craniovertebraler Winkel (CVA) von 47,27 ° (Standardabweichung; SD 2,36); in der Kontrollgruppe lag der CVA bei 51,26 ° (SD 4,78) ( Abb. 2 ) 26 . Überdies imponierten eine reduzierte Beweglichkeit bei aktiven Nackenbewegungen, eine auf der dominanten Kopfschmerzseite deutlich verringerte Beweglichkeit beim Flexions-Rotations-Test (FRT; 33 ° vs. 43 °) sowie mehr Schmerzen während des FRT ( Abb.…”
Section: Anamneseunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation