1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0056-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Different Type of MR-Contrast in the Early Phase of Functional Activation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the local volume increase in the microvessels at that site occurs as early as the HbR increase (Malonek et al, 1997), the above consideration may also shed some light on the "initial dip" (i.e., a negative BOLD polarity) analyzed in some fMRI studies Hennig et al, 1997;Hu et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2000). This effect may be caused by special initial conditions in which an increase of HbR driving the BOLD signal in negative direction is stronger than a concomitant volume increase driving it into positive direction.…”
Section: Hemodynamics and The Bold Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the local volume increase in the microvessels at that site occurs as early as the HbR increase (Malonek et al, 1997), the above consideration may also shed some light on the "initial dip" (i.e., a negative BOLD polarity) analyzed in some fMRI studies Hennig et al, 1997;Hu et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2000). This effect may be caused by special initial conditions in which an increase of HbR driving the BOLD signal in negative direction is stronger than a concomitant volume increase driving it into positive direction.…”
Section: Hemodynamics and The Bold Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• Observation of the pre-undershoot in fMRI (Hennig et al 1997;Hu et al 1997;Menon et al 1995) and correlation with optical imaging (Malonek and Grinvald 1996) was reported. This is still highly controversial as the effect is very subtle and the hypothesized mechanisms producing it (rapid change in blood volume or ∆CMRO 2 ) remain hotly debated.…”
Section: Advancesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Early dip responses to activation seem to be confirmed with a number of different studies, but some questions still remain unanswered. [6][7][8][9][10] Nevertheless, the dip and post-stimulus undershoot do not seem to be there all the time and the results, therefore, remain contentious. In addition, for animal studies, the presence and absence of overshoot and undershoot seem to be also dependent on the anesthetic agents used.…”
Section: Major Research Issues and Open Ques-tionsmentioning
confidence: 99%