2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca52c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Dynamic Difference between Stealthy and Standard Coronal Mass Ejections?

Abstract: Stealthy coronal mass ejections (CMEs), lacking low coronal signatures, may result in significant geomagnetic storms. However, the mechanism of stealthy CMEs is still highly debated. In this work, we investigate whether there are differences between stealthy and standard CMEs in terms of their dynamic behaviors. Seven stealthy and eight standard CMEs with low speeds are selected. We calculate two-dimensional speed distributions of CMEs based on the cross-correlation method, rather than the unidimensional speed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.12 0.85 10 31 ( )  ´erg. Assuming an increment of the CME's mass of ∼10% during its propagation, m CME reaches (1.89 ± 0.52) × 10 15 g, which is close to the mass of the CME front on 2011 September 13 derived by using the WL observation (Ying et al 2023). As a consequence, the kinetic energy of the CME increases to (3.43 ± 0.94) × 10 31 erg, which is 1 order of magnitude higher than that of the HC (Table 2).…”
Section: Energeticssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…3.12 0.85 10 31 ( )  ´erg. Assuming an increment of the CME's mass of ∼10% during its propagation, m CME reaches (1.89 ± 0.52) × 10 15 g, which is close to the mass of the CME front on 2011 September 13 derived by using the WL observation (Ying et al 2023). As a consequence, the kinetic energy of the CME increases to (3.43 ± 0.94) × 10 31 erg, which is 1 order of magnitude higher than that of the HC (Table 2).…”
Section: Energeticssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For these reasons, the velocity distribution of the CS and the post-CME environment surrounding the CS is assumed to be equal to the outflow speed of the blob and uniformly distributed. Statistically, the post-CME speed is expected to be smaller than the measured speed of the CME front of ∼250 km s −1 , as we derived from a comparison between the speeds of the CME core and front measured in a series of slow CME events reported by Ying et al (2023). We obtained that on average the ratio between these two speeds is between 0.3 and 1.5 in a distance range between 1.7 and 3 R e .…”
Section: R T Hmentioning
confidence: 62%