2003
DOI: 10.1086/344126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?

Abstract: Abstract:Using data from 1998, we show that the gender log wage gap in Sweden increases throughout the wage distribution and accelerates in the upper tail of the distribution, which we interpret as a glass ceiling effect. Using earlier data, we show that the same pattern held at the beginning of the 1990's but not in the prior two decades. Further, we do not find this pattern either for the log wage gap between immigrants and nonimmigrants in the Swedish labor market or for the gender gap in the U.S. labor mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

48
621
6
27

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 707 publications
(702 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
48
621
6
27
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, there is also evidence that the effects of occupation are not constant across the wage distribution and that occupational segregation may impose more of a wage penalty on women at the top than at the bottom of the wage distribution. Albrecht et al (2003), for example, find that the occupational distribution explains more of the gender wage gap among high-wage than low-wage Swedish workers. Barón and Cobb-Clark (2010) find similar results for Australian women in both private-and public-sector employment, while Arulampalam et al (2007) find the same for some (though not all) European countries.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis: Accounting For Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, there is also evidence that the effects of occupation are not constant across the wage distribution and that occupational segregation may impose more of a wage penalty on women at the top than at the bottom of the wage distribution. Albrecht et al (2003), for example, find that the occupational distribution explains more of the gender wage gap among high-wage than low-wage Swedish workers. Barón and Cobb-Clark (2010) find similar results for Australian women in both private-and public-sector employment, while Arulampalam et al (2007) find the same for some (though not all) European countries.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis: Accounting For Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, comparing the distributions of log wages of men and women who work full time, the gender gap is greatest at the highest quantiles, although this effect is not as pronounced as in the Scandinavian countries. As a first step to understand this pattern, we use the M-M method without correcting for selection as applied in Albrecht, Björklund, and Vroman (2003) to decompose the difference between the male and female full-time log wage distributions into a component due to the difference in the distributions of observable characteristics between genders and a component due to the difference in the distributions of rewards to these characteristics between genders. As in the Swedish case, the difference in the distributions of characteristics explains little of the difference between the two log wage distributions.…”
Section: Application: Log Wage Gender Gap In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between the genders and a component due to the difference in the distributions of rewards to these characteristics between the genders. Such studies include Albrecht, Björklund, and Vroman (2003) for Sweden, de la Rica, Dolado, and Llorens (2007) for Spain, and Arulampalam, Booth, and Bryan (2007) across several European countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method estimates the marginal density function of BMI in a given country implied by different counterfactual distributions of all the covariates included. This counterfactual decomposition approach has been developed by Machado and Mata (2005) and repeatedly applied to the analysis of changes in the wage schedule across time and space (Garcia et al, 2001;Albrecht et al, 2003;Melly, 2005;Arulampalam et al, 2007). The methodology is applied here to an analysis of the variation in the BMI distribution in Spain with respect to Italy in the year 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%