BackgroundObjective assessment of medical handover skills is challenging. This short communication will illustrate the use of a modified Delphi technique in utilising both clinicians and educationalists to produce a fair and robust tool to assess medical student competence in handover.
MethodUsing three rounds in a reactive Delphi process, two case-specific assessment tools were formulated. Round two involved clinical experts to respond to pre-defined criteria set in round 1, rather than being invited to develop their own benchmarks. Round 3 saw medical educationalists identify the components that a student should be expected to hand over at their stage of training.
ResultsFor Case 1, twenty-eight initial key handover components were refined down to eighteen which were then encompassed in the final Case 1 assessment tool.For Case 2, thirty-one initial components were refined down to seven key handover components. These were then used to populate the final Case 2 assessment tool.
DiscussionThrough the survey of clinical and medical education experts, the modified Delphi process allows the formation of a standardised assessment for individual handover scenarios, whilst ensuring a reflection of current clinical best practice. It is however, time consuming and the final tool is not necessarily faultless, as it invariably affected by the experiences and opinions of the group members. Continual validity judgements in assessment standardisation are essential.