1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.00123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Place for Geography in the Analysis of Health Inequality?

Abstract: This paper considers how ideas and evidence concerning geographical health variation are used in discourses relating to health inequalities. We consider the different concepts of space and place which are employed in these debates. Much of the discussion in the literature focuses on the relative importance of compositional and contextual effects in determining health variation between different geographical areas. We discuss some of the theory which might illuminate the possible impact of place on health inequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neighbourhood socio-economic characteristics contribute to the explanation of social inequalities in health [38]. Furthermore, the socio-economic conditions that individuals experience during childhood have a considerable influence on their later life; inequalities in childhood have both direct and long-term negative effects [39-41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neighbourhood socio-economic characteristics contribute to the explanation of social inequalities in health [38]. Furthermore, the socio-economic conditions that individuals experience during childhood have a considerable influence on their later life; inequalities in childhood have both direct and long-term negative effects [39-41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaplan stated that "perhaps nowhere is the need for social epidemiological theory more apparent than in the study of "place" effects on health [39]. One of the main problems in the study of neighbourhoods and health is the lack of development of theories about plausible social, psychological, and biological links between specific features of the neighbourhoods and specific health outcomes [40]. Shankardass and Dunn [41] have recently argued that social epidemiology has been proficient in describing patterns in neighbourhood inequalities but has been less capable at fostering an understanding of how these effects relate to the social mechanisms of causation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are unable to test whether these missing cases were somehow systematic and thus biased; interviewers may be less likely to rate certain neighborhoods altogether, such as those with atypical characteristics like a single building. Second, it may be argued that the neighborhood SES measure used in this study represents compositional effects—relating to the distribution of people with similar characteristics—and is not comparable to interviewer observations which represent contextual effects—relating to the social and physical environment in which people live (Curtis & Jones, 1998). Distinguishing between ecological influence and ecological composition is challenging and likely requires temporal ordering of both survey and contextual data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%