2019
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Place for Immunotherapy for Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer?

Abstract: Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 revolutionized the treatment of microsatellite instable metastatic colon cancer. Such treatment is now a standard of care for these patients. However, when used as monotherapy checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 are not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable tumors. Recent advances in biology provide a rationale for this intrinsic resistance and support the evaluation of combination therapy to re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(99 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above analysis, we can conclude that the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab is more effective than nivolumab alone, consistent with previous findings [19,20]. Ghiringhelli et al testified that checkpoint monotherapy inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 were not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable tumors [55]. Neal compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent SCLC, whereas ORR was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy [56].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the above analysis, we can conclude that the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab is more effective than nivolumab alone, consistent with previous findings [19,20]. Ghiringhelli et al testified that checkpoint monotherapy inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 were not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable tumors [55]. Neal compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent SCLC, whereas ORR was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy [56].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a result, these tumors are highly immunogenic, have high PD‐L1 expression, and consequently exhibit robust cytotoxic T‐cell responses 21 . However, MSS tumors are mostly resistant to anti‐PD‐1 monotherapy because of low mutational burden, immunoexclusion, and immunosuppression 13 . The addition of chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or MEK inhibitors is thought to sensitize MSS tumors to immunotherapy, as these agents potentiate the immune response 14,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from targeted radiosensitization, HSP90 inhibition may also enhance the priming of anti-tumor immune mechanisms that has been observed upon radiotherapy but appears to be restricted to higher single doses and strongly hypofractionated protocols (3 × 8 Gy) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)42). Improved priming of anti-tumor immune mechanisms would be particularly desirable for patients with high-risk CRC whose tumors are prone to local failure as well as metastasis formation, and who receive radiotherapy in fractions of ≤ 5 Gy -for instance in combination with immunotherapeutic protocols (69)(70)(71). Therefore, the primary motivation for our present study was to examine how HSP90 inhibition enhances radiotherapy-induced immune cell priming with the clinical perspective to develop improved treatment options for high-risk cases of colon cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%