2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the timing of cell divisions of embryos derived from sexed-sperm to that of conventionally derived embryos, no statistical difference was discernible, which was independent from the sex. In contrast, male human embryos have been found to develop at a significantly faster rate than female embryos 67,68 . Moreover, there was no increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells in embryos derived from sexed-sperm compared to the conventional sperm derived embryos, suggesting that sperm sexing does not cause downstream cell death beyond the blastocyst stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When comparing the timing of cell divisions of embryos derived from sexed-sperm to that of conventionally derived embryos, no statistical difference was discernible, which was independent from the sex. In contrast, male human embryos have been found to develop at a significantly faster rate than female embryos 67,68 . Moreover, there was no increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells in embryos derived from sexed-sperm compared to the conventional sperm derived embryos, suggesting that sperm sexing does not cause downstream cell death beyond the blastocyst stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Such technology has captured the imagination of practitioners as both a research tool (Costa-Borges et al, 2016;Hardarson et al, 2015;Mölder et al, 2015), comparing embryos resulting from various clinical conditions (Balakier et al, 2016;Gurbuz et al, 2016;Hashimoto et al, 2016;Kaihola et al, 2016;Lindgren et al, 2016), and as a potential prognosticator in clinical practice (Adamson et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2016;Kong et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016;Milewski et al, 2015;Mizobe et al, 2016;Rubio et al, 2014;VerMilyea et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2016aWu et al, , 2016bYang et al, 2014), although some studies negate this (Freour et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2016aWu et al, , 2016b. Bronet et al (2015) even found distinctive morphokinetic differences between male and female embryos. A few studies have purported to relate discriminating morphokinetics of euploid and aneuploid embryos (Campbell et al, 2013a(Campbell et al, , 2013bMinasi et al, 2016;Vera-Rodriguez et al, 2015), although this has been disputed (Rienzi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Alfarawati et al (2011) showed that male embryos developed significantly faster than females, and using time-lapse technology. Bronet et al (2015) found that two specific kinetic variables were able to predict a female embryo (timing between division to three cells and division to four cells [ > 2 h] and timing of morula formation [80.8-90.9 h]). In our current practice, we promote blastocyst transfer with the highest speed of development (=highest expansion rate on day 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%