2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Role for Prophylactic Antibiotics after Stented Hypospadias Repair?

Abstract: When postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics were not administered, we identified no increased incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections or complications. Our data suggest that prophylactic oral antibiotics may not be needed in cases of stented hypospadias repair. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the rational use of antimicrobials. It can potentially serve as a basis for a prospective, multicenter, randomized study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Growing evidence demonstrates that postoperative antibiotics may not be needed for stented repair. 13 Congruent with our data, Kanaroglou and colleagues did not have any cases of symptomatic UTI, reasserting that infectious complications from hypospadias have a low incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Growing evidence demonstrates that postoperative antibiotics may not be needed for stented repair. 13 Congruent with our data, Kanaroglou and colleagues did not have any cases of symptomatic UTI, reasserting that infectious complications from hypospadias have a low incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, the use of prophylaxis was opposed because it did not decrease the number of infections related to the hypospadias procedure. 4,17 We only registered symptomatic UTIs confirmed by positive urine cultures. Therefore, our study design is more similar to the latter two studies mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, however, unlikely as recurrent UTIs usually cause significant distress to both child and parents and will be somehow captured along the clinical course and follow‐up. Given the paucity of tertiary pediatric centres within the catchment area and our high rate of follow‐up post‐hypospadias (reported to be as high as 96% in some series ) we believe that most patients who developed recurrent UTIs would have been identified at either regular follow‐up visits, or through referral in the acute setting. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that missed UTIs could be a limitation to our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%