2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Role for α-Blockers in Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Existing evidence from randomized, controlled trials shows that α-blockers are associated with improvement in ureteral stent symptoms and supports their use in routine clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two previous meta-analyses by Yakoubi et al (four RCTs) and Lamb et al (five RCTs) have investigated the same topic and some of the major outcomes as the present meta-analysis, including urinary tract symptoms and pain (33,34). However, these meta-analyses had limitations, including: i) A single method (USSQ) was used to evaluate USS, therefore other questionnaires, including the IPSS, VAPS, SF-36 and OABq were not included; ii) an unreasonable method was used by Lamb et al to detect publication bias (<10 studies); iii) Lamb et al used the Jadad Scale to assess risk of bias, which lacks a consideration of allocation concealment and is not recommended for use by the Cochrane Collaboration (35); iv) no sensitivity analysis was performed and significant between-trial heterogeneity was detected; v) small sample sizes; vi) no adverse events were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two previous meta-analyses by Yakoubi et al (four RCTs) and Lamb et al (five RCTs) have investigated the same topic and some of the major outcomes as the present meta-analysis, including urinary tract symptoms and pain (33,34). However, these meta-analyses had limitations, including: i) A single method (USSQ) was used to evaluate USS, therefore other questionnaires, including the IPSS, VAPS, SF-36 and OABq were not included; ii) an unreasonable method was used by Lamb et al to detect publication bias (<10 studies); iii) Lamb et al used the Jadad Scale to assess risk of bias, which lacks a consideration of allocation concealment and is not recommended for use by the Cochrane Collaboration (35); iv) no sensitivity analysis was performed and significant between-trial heterogeneity was detected; v) small sample sizes; vi) no adverse events were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As compared with previous meta-analyses conducted by Yakoubi et al (33) and Lamb et al (34), numerous studies meeting the inclusion criteria have emerged in recent years, and the targets observed for USSQ have altered (15,27-29,31,32). Joshi et al (5) performed a study including 309 patients in order to broadly collate these symptoms and the USSQ was developed, covering a total of six sections and 38 scoring items, including: Urinary symptoms, pain, general health, work performance, sexual matters and additional problems (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Considering the current study and the two meta-analyses that have been recently published (21,22), it seems that alpha-blockers can effectively relieve stent-related symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Factors that contribute to DJ--associated morbidity include stent design, size, positioning, associated UTI, and duration (25). Recent use of drug eluting stents (26) and alpha blockers (27) were reported to cause less pain and discomfort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%