2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a role for antiandrogen monotherapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with metastatic (M1) prostate cancer receiving bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy were also reported to have better quality‐of‐life scores, for maintenance of physical capacity and sexual interest, than patients receiving castration [10]. Although castration provided a significantly greater survival benefit (median survival extended by 6 weeks) than bicalutamide 150 mg in that study, subsequent exploratory analyses suggested that survival rates were similar among those patients with baseline PSA levels of ≤ 400 ng/mL [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with metastatic (M1) prostate cancer receiving bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy were also reported to have better quality‐of‐life scores, for maintenance of physical capacity and sexual interest, than patients receiving castration [10]. Although castration provided a significantly greater survival benefit (median survival extended by 6 weeks) than bicalutamide 150 mg in that study, subsequent exploratory analyses suggested that survival rates were similar among those patients with baseline PSA levels of ≤ 400 ng/mL [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of antiandrogens remains the limitation of initial increase of testosterone (flare phenomenon) under treatment with LHRH analogues. Alternatively, they can also be used as monotherapy, especially in patients with marginal metastatic load with consideration of a better quality of life but only slightly shorter progression-free and overall survival in comparison to castration [4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with metastatic disease (n = 805), at a median follow-up of 1.9 years, bicalutamide 150 mg was not as effective as castration, although the difference in median survival was only 42 days [139]. Post hoc analysis of these results revealed that bicalutamide and castration had similar efficacy in patients with a pre-treatment PSA level of ≤400 ng/ml, while survival data only favored castration in patients with the highest tumour burdens at study entry (PSA >400 ng/ml) [140]. In patients with non-metastatic disease, at a median follow-up of 6.3 years, bicalutamide 150 mg was as effective as traditional hormonal therapy, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in terms of overall survival or time to disease progression [138].…”
Section: Bicalutamidementioning
confidence: 41%