Is there a role for traditional governance systems in South Africa’s new water management regime?

Abstract

The transition to democracy in South Africa in 1994 catalysed new forms of governance in all sectors of society including water resource management. This paper examines the extent to which traditional governance systems have been acknowledged and incorporated into these new water management institutions and approaches. The research focused on understanding the cultural, religious and customary practices and rules relevant to water resource management as well as the roles of traditional leaders in 2 water user associations in the Eastern Cape Province. Findings from the research reveal that both state governance systems and traditional governance systems are relevant to water resource management in the study areas. However, management is predominantly guided by state-driven strategies which are based on statutory legal systems. Yet, traditional governance systems, including customary laws and cultural and religious practices, have an important role to play in achieving the purposes of the water user associations. Failure to acknowledge and incorporate aspects of these traditional governance systems may undermine the ability of government to achieve the objectives of the National Water Act.

Mapping the Relationship of Inter-Village Variation in Agroforestry Tree Survival with Social and Ecological Characteristics: The Case of the Vi Agroforestry Project, Mara Region, Tanzania

“…A recent study by Behre [27] highlighted the mismatch between objective and subjective quality of life conditions as important factors for adoption. In addition, the importance of the traditional village system [28][29][30] and differences in social capital [31,32] are important factors to consider and learn more about for interventions to be successful.…”

Adaptive capacity and water governance in the Keiskamma River Catchment, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

“…With regard to equity issues, it is also important to include societal groups that are less well represented and organised, such as historically disadvantaged people. In addition, regenerate and incorporate traditional water knowledge, especially in former homelands (Kapfudzaruwa, et al, 2009). …”

“…Sustaining livelihoods in rural areas could become a problem as heat endangers crops, and diseases (rift valley fever) endanger cattle (Interview W2). WUAs and catchment management agencies (CMAs) were meant to be inclusive instruments but have failed, since only two WUAs are in operation (Bourblanc, 2012;Department of Water Affairs, 2013;Kapfudzaruwa et al, 2009;Kemerink et al, 2013;Muller, et al, 2009). Kemerink et al (2013) show that WUAs favour White commercial farmers with long experience in water governance but neglect the fuzzy organisational structures and differing normative settings in former homelands.…”

The evaluation of the heritage of the 1956 South African water policy

“…The 1956 water policy was, according to Pienaar & van der Schyff (2007), based on a combination of Roman-Dutch and English legal principles. This meant that water was controlled through a riparian system, which, in turn, required that access to water was part and parcel of the ownership of land Kapfudzaruwa & Sowman (2009).…”