Is there a trade‐off between environmental performance and financial sustainability in microfinance institutions? Evidence from South and Southeast Asia

Abstract

The environmental performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) has received considerable attention in recent years. However, the question of whether MFIs' involvement in environmental practices can drive their financial sustainability has yet to be addressed. This is the knowledge gap that we intend to investigate in the current study. Specifically, using a panel of 587 MFI‐year observations for the 2007–2014 period, we investigate whether pursuing proactive environmental strategies, individually and in aggregation, can improve the financial sustainability of MFIs in South and Southeast Asian countries. By analyzing aggregate environmental performance, we demonstrate that environmental performance adversely influences the financial performance of MFIs. This provides support for the trade‐off hypothesis that predicts that higher levels of environmental practices worsen firms' financial sustainability. Our results also show that the relationship between the individual environmental performance dimensions and financial performance of MFIs varies with the individual dimension of green practice being considered. Finally, we find that there is a significant variation in this relationship across MFI ownership types. The findings have valuable implications for practitioners, investors, and policymakers.

Comparative Analysis of Microfinance Governance: Implications for Impact of Social Inequality and Poverty Reduction

“…Microfinance enterprises' financial sustainability-environmental performance trade-off has been studied. 2022 research on this trade-off in South and Southeast Asia and microfinance companies' financial and environmental dynamics supports this claim [6]. These studies demonstrate how the COVID-19 pandemic and natural catastrophes affect Bangladeshi microfinance, family welfare, financial performance, and sustainability.…”

The effect of digitalization transformation on greenwashing of Chinese listed companies: an analysis from the dual perspectives of resource-based view and legitimacy

“…To obtain government subsidies, enterprises need to maintain a good relationship with the government and choose the game strategy of welcoming the government, which may induce enterprises to use government subsidies for non-green innovation activities, resulting in resource crowding out of environmental protection activities (Ilinitch et al, 1998). Enterprises that receive government subsidies may have opportunistic behaviors to cater to the government and managers, resulting in the crowding out effect of government subsidies on both green technology innovation and green practical patent innovation, which weaken the environmental performance of enterprises (Ayayi and Wijesiri, 2022). (3) Nonlinear relationship.…”

The impact of green innovation initiatives on competitiveness and financial performance of the land transport industry

“…Employee conduct (EC) embodies acceptable or professional behavior that shows consistent appreciation and consideration of environmental drivers to produce better performance and improved innovation [ 58 ]. Employee conduct and environmental concerns can lessen how negatively company actions affect the environment [ 59 ], while the top management is responsible for educating its employees on the practice of social and environmental responsiveness [ 60 ]. The study of Wang et al [ 28 ] indicated that employee conduct positively impacts the green innovation practices of an organization.…”