2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Yusof, Ishak, Zahidi, Abidin and Baker (2014) agreed that the relationship between emotional intelligence and personality characteristics was indeed significant, but generally there is no correlation between emotional intelligence and general intelligence, as discovered by Amelang and Steinmayr (2006). Bahadori (2012) and Zhou, Estrada and Bojica (2014) found that all dimensions of emotional intelligence are relevant and positively related to entrepreneurial behaviour, while Zhou et al (2014) suggested that appraisal and expression of emotion are not significantly associated with most success criteria.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, Yusof, Ishak, Zahidi, Abidin and Baker (2014) agreed that the relationship between emotional intelligence and personality characteristics was indeed significant, but generally there is no correlation between emotional intelligence and general intelligence, as discovered by Amelang and Steinmayr (2006). Bahadori (2012) and Zhou, Estrada and Bojica (2014) found that all dimensions of emotional intelligence are relevant and positively related to entrepreneurial behaviour, while Zhou et al (2014) suggested that appraisal and expression of emotion are not significantly associated with most success criteria.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walter, Humphrey and Cole (2012) pointed out that there is little consensus on the true meaning of emotional intelligence, resulting from the complexity of the construct and no generalised view on its applicability or its existence. Moreover, emotional intelligence has been criticised to measure nothing more than just intelligence and personality (Amelang & Steinmayr, 2006). …”
Section: Emotional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EI was touted as a very promising construct for personnel selection, some researchers reported difficulty finding any predictive value in it beyond what was accounted for by general intelligence and conscientiousness (Amelang and Steinmayr 2006). Others found evidence that it moderated the relationship between conscientiousness and work performance such that conscientiousness positively predicts work performance if EI is also high, and negatively predicts performance otherwise (Douglas, Frink, and Ferris 2004).…”
Section: Work Ethicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting results have been obtained when conscientiousness is included together with variables of ability; in their study of social status (income and professional status), Amelang & Steinmayr (2006) found that general intelligence and conscientiousness had approximately the same significant influence on the two performance criteria, while the meta-analytical structural equation modeling performed by Ng & Feldman ( 2010) showed that an individual's cognitive ability and conscientiousness mediate the effects of both education and organizational tenure on in-role and extra-role job performances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%