Is there an illusion of symmetry in cultural distance from Asia–pacific Emnes? the role of business groups in navigating cultural distance through ambidextrous learning

Venkateswaran, Ramya Tarakad

doi:10.1007/s10490-022-09811-2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 171 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2021; O’Reilly and Tushman, 2013), ambidextrous learning (Fu et al. , 2021; Venkateswaran, 2022) and ambidextrous innovation (Ben Rejeb et al. , 2019; Zhang et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, from a conceptual standpoint, we propose the concept of ambidextrous environmental strategy, which further enriches the literature related to environmental strategy and ambidexterity. Most existing studies related to ambidexterity focused on organizational ambidexterity (Christofi et al, 2021;O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013), ambidextrous learning (Fu et al, 2021;Venkateswaran, 2022) and ambidextrous innovation (Ben Rejeb et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2022b), etc. This study introduces the concept of ambidexterity into environmental strategy.…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Configuring green intellectual capital to achieve ambidextrous environmental strategy: based on resource orchestration theory

Fang

Feng

et al. 2023

JIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeSince a single environmental strategy is not sufficient to deal with the various institutional forces that firms are facing, this study proposes ambidextrous environmental strategy and aims to explore its drivers. Based on the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework and resource orchestration theory, the authors investigate the configurational effects of perceived institutional force, green intellectual capital (GIC) and paradox cognition on achieving ambidextrous environmental strategy.Design/methodology/approachTo explore these configurational effects, this study uses two-waved survey data from 317 Chinese manufacturing firms and the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method.FindingsThere are three equivalent configurational paths leading to ambidextrous environmental strategy. The findings suggest that firms with paradox cognition can better orchestrate GIC to achieve ambidextrous environmental strategy under different perceived institutional force. This study also finds three substitution effects between distinct conditions.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the existing literature by introducing the concept of ambidexterity into the field of environmental strategy and using the AMC framework to explore the configurational paths driving ambidextrous environmental strategy.

show abstract

“…, 2021; O’Reilly and Tushman, 2013), ambidextrous learning (Fu et al. , 2021; Venkateswaran, 2022) and ambidextrous innovation (Ben Rejeb et al. , 2019; Zhang et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%