2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12626-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Is There Anyone in There?”: Caregivers and Professionals’ Mutual Positioning to Take Care of Vegetative State Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These representational contents resonate with the ones found in the Italian press (Zulato et al, 2021), where the vegetative state patient was differently represented as aware, unaware, or possibly aware, and distinctive positions on end-of-life were reported -for example, supporting or opposing treatment withdrawal. Moreover, as already demonstrated in the literature involving caregivers and health professionals (Holland et al, 2014;Kuehlmeyer et al, 2012;Zulato et al, 2022), these contents address different ontological and ethical dilemmas, such as what is the nature of the vegetative state and whether to withdraw treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These representational contents resonate with the ones found in the Italian press (Zulato et al, 2021), where the vegetative state patient was differently represented as aware, unaware, or possibly aware, and distinctive positions on end-of-life were reported -for example, supporting or opposing treatment withdrawal. Moreover, as already demonstrated in the literature involving caregivers and health professionals (Holland et al, 2014;Kuehlmeyer et al, 2012;Zulato et al, 2022), these contents address different ontological and ethical dilemmas, such as what is the nature of the vegetative state and whether to withdraw treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conversely, by anchoring the vegetative state to ‘non‐life’, LW worked to de‐personify them. Both re‐personification and de‐personification had been described in the literature involving caregivers and health practitioners and were identified as being differently functional to signify care practices (Bird‐David & Israeli, 2010; Zulato et al, 2022). However, the dialogical dynamic of how they are constructed was not discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term “person” is admittedly a complex one, but we can give a preliminary definition of “person” by opposing it to impersonal objects and things, and also by distinguishing it from the mere human body, in the sense that to be a person implies being immersed in human relations founded in human capacities ‐traditionally considering rationality as a key element (Locke, 1690). Other central features that have been used to define persons are awareness (Zulato et al., 2022), first‐person perspective (Baker, 2005), or attributes such as emotionality or empathy (Honigsbaum, 2013). However, as it will be discussed later, these ontological approach does not seem to exhaust our comprehension of what or who a person is.…”
Section: Identity and Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%