2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There Gender Bias on the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Examination?

Abstract: Background: When oral examinations are administered, examiner subjectivity may possibly affect ratings, particularly when examiner severity is influenced by examinee characteristics (e.g., gender) that are independent of examinee ability. This study explored whether the ratings of the general surgery oral certifying examination (CE) of the American Board of Surgery and likelihood of passing the CE were influenced by the gender of examinees or examiners. Materials and methods: Data collected from examinees who … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among thoracic surgery residents, meaningful autonomy, defined as passive help or supervision only, was given to only 30% of female residents compared with 365 of male residents ( P =0.02) 65. Evaluation of residents’ autonomy showed an even more pronounced difference, with female residents receiving only 19% of a meaningful autonomy evaluation compared with 33% for male residents ( P <0.001) 68. Female residents’ tended to underestimate their abilities compared with faculty assessment has been the main topic in 3 papers,70,72,73 with male residents’ self-assessment scores demonstrating a stronger correlation with the attending score 72.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among thoracic surgery residents, meaningful autonomy, defined as passive help or supervision only, was given to only 30% of female residents compared with 365 of male residents ( P =0.02) 65. Evaluation of residents’ autonomy showed an even more pronounced difference, with female residents receiving only 19% of a meaningful autonomy evaluation compared with 33% for male residents ( P <0.001) 68. Female residents’ tended to underestimate their abilities compared with faculty assessment has been the main topic in 3 papers,70,72,73 with male residents’ self-assessment scores demonstrating a stronger correlation with the attending score 72.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…65 Evaluation of residents' autonomy showed an even more pronounced difference, with female residents receiving only 19% of a meaningful autonomy evaluation compared with 33% for male residents (P < 0.001). 68 Female residents' tended to underestimate their abilities compared with faculty assessment has been the main topic in 3 papers, 70,72,73 with male residents' self-assessment scores demonstrating a stronger correlation with the attending score. 72 On the contrary, in a study conducted in Norway 71 assessing residents during laparoscopic appendicectomy, no negative gender bias toward women trainees was demonstrated.…”
Section: Surgical Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There does not appear to be a gender-based difference in qualifying or certifying exam failure rates. 48 49 However, an in-depth analysis of demographic factors demonstrated an association between having children and failing the certifying examination. Married women with children had a higher chance of failing than single women.…”
Section: Surgical Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We looked at our general surgery certifying examination for evidence of sex bias and found none. 1 Individual examiner scoring patterns also undergo analysis looking for sex bias and the (rare) outliers are counseled. The authors assert that the examination format is sex biased is not born out by research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before 2019, sex was the only demographic characteristic collected by the ABS. We looked at our general surgery certifying examination for evidence of sex bias and found none 1 . Individual examiner scoring patterns also undergo analysis looking for sex bias and the (rare) outliers are counseled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%