1996
DOI: 10.1080/000368496328416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there more than one critical concentration ratio? An empirical test for the Portland cement industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we choose the HHI of the biggest five accounting firms, it can be denoted as HHI5. Azzam et al (1996) pointed out that when HHI = 0, it suggests a perfect competition, and when HHI = 1, it suggests a monopoly. When the market is a pure monopoly, it means only one company exists and the indicator is 1.…”
Section: Perfect Competitionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If we choose the HHI of the biggest five accounting firms, it can be denoted as HHI5. Azzam et al (1996) pointed out that when HHI = 0, it suggests a perfect competition, and when HHI = 1, it suggests a monopoly. When the market is a pure monopoly, it means only one company exists and the indicator is 1.…”
Section: Perfect Competitionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies show that an industry may be essentially competitive but become effectively collusive beyond a certain level of concentration. This is known as the critical concentration ratio, CCR (Azzam et al, 1996;Bradburd and Over, 1982). For example, Bain (1951) found a CCR 8 of 0.7 in American manufacturing industry.…”
Section: Corporate Environmental Citizenship Variation In Developing mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Searching for a critical concentration ratio has intrigued many scholars in industrial-organization economics over the years, although there seems to be no "one size fits all" that antitrust authorities can rely on for every market. [30][31][32][33] Moreover, the notion of a critical concentration ratio may be more realistic than assuming a smooth transition between monopoly and competitive pricing. In 1997, the year before the generic lorazepam price rise, CR 4 Empirical evidence strongly suggests substitution difficulty.…”
Section: ■■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%