Is Treatment of Gingival Recession Predictable?

Noncheva, Veska; Dobreva, Maria; Chenchev, Ivan

doi:10.9790/5728-1205050711

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of it we will build hierarchical model (see [20,21]) of the rate of increase of the keratinized gingiva width. Hierarchical models of phenomena from oral surgery are described in [18,24].…”

Section: Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Width of Keratinized Gingiva

Noncheva¹,

Dobreva²,

Chenchev³

2017

IOSR JM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to offer a method for studying the treatment result of gingival recession. A parameter showing the success of the surgical treatment of gingival recessions is the keratinized gingival width. It was measured four times: at baseline, after 1 month, after 3 months and after 6 months. Every patient has data that can be described by an individual trend. Bayesian hierarchical model of the keratinized gingiva width's increase rate is built.

show abstract

Section: Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Width of Keratinized Gingiva

Noncheva¹,

Dobreva²,

Chenchev³

2017

IOSR JM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surgical treatment of multiple gingival recessions by the combination of autograftand allogenic lyophilized dura mater: a clinical case

Nosova

Волова

Sharov³

et al. 2021

Parodontologiâ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relevance. Gingival recession is the apical migration of the gingival tissues associated with the exposure of the roots and alveolar bone loss. The prevalence of single recessions in people over 18 years old is 86.7% whereas multiple recessions, i.e. where all teeth are affected, amount up to 28.6%. High prevalence of the pathology necessitates improvement of the approach and tactic of multiple recession treatment in patients with different phenotypes. Nowadays, the use of autograft is the gold standard of multiple recession treatment. However, the technique has its drawbacks. The purpose of the present work was to assess the response to surgery and evaluate the final result of multiple recession treatment in one subject where the combination of autogenic and allogenic grafts was used in the same study design.Materials and methods. The paper presents and describes a clinical case where auto- and allografts were used in one patient to treat multiple gingival recessions.Results. All parameters of the gingival recession assessment showed comparable clinical benefit in all sites of autograft and allograft (dura mater) application. The root coverage was more than 80% around 13 teeth and less than 80% around 11 teeth.Conclusion. The results of the autograft and allograft (dura mater) application were comparable, response to surgery was the same; besides, the allograft (dura mater) is attractive for combined and independent use during surgical treatment of multiple and especially full-mouth recessions.

show abstract

Is Treatment of Gingival Recession Predictable?

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Width of Keratinized Gingiva

Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Width of Keratinized Gingiva

Surgical treatment of multiple gingival recessions by the combination of autograftand allogenic lyophilized dura mater: a clinical case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About