2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-015-0343-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Triple P Positive Parenting Program Effective on Anxious Children and Their Parents? 4th Month Follow up Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a body of evidence shows that behavioural parenting programmes are beneficial for children’s behavioural and emotional problems and in improving parenting practices, attrition rates between 30 and 60% were posted, depending on the sample included and the methodology applied (Chacko et al, 2016; Nicholson & Sanders, 1999; Oliver, 2013; Özyurt et al, 2016; Sanders, Baker, & Turner, 2012; Sanders et al, 2000). Dropout rates associated with Triple-P were lower compared to other parenting programmes, and the mean dropout rate across randomised controlled trials with community samples was reported to be between 15% and 37% (First 5 Sonoma County, 2012; Jones, 2014; Turner et al, 1999; ‘The World of Triple P’, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While a body of evidence shows that behavioural parenting programmes are beneficial for children’s behavioural and emotional problems and in improving parenting practices, attrition rates between 30 and 60% were posted, depending on the sample included and the methodology applied (Chacko et al, 2016; Nicholson & Sanders, 1999; Oliver, 2013; Özyurt et al, 2016; Sanders, Baker, & Turner, 2012; Sanders et al, 2000). Dropout rates associated with Triple-P were lower compared to other parenting programmes, and the mean dropout rate across randomised controlled trials with community samples was reported to be between 15% and 37% (First 5 Sonoma County, 2012; Jones, 2014; Turner et al, 1999; ‘The World of Triple P’, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on social learning principles and child and family behaviour therapy, this approach has strong empirical support of intervention with children, particularly those with conduct problems, the most common reason for referral to psychological and psychiatric services in childhood (Aghebati, Gharraee, Hakim, Shoshtari, & Gohari, 2014; de Graaf, Speetjens, Smit, de Wolff, & Tavecchio, 2008; Furlong et al, 2010). In addition to disruptive, aggressive externalising problems in childhood, recent studies have challenged the effectiveness of Triple-P on internalising problems, such as low self-esteem, childhood anxiety and depression, including treatment resistant depression in children victimised by peers (Furlong et al, 2010; Healy & Sanders, 2017; Özyurt, Gencer, Öztürk, & Özbek, 2016). In addition, Wakimizu, Fujioka, Iejima, and Miyamoto (2014) reported that group Triple-P is effective for reducing children’s behavioural problems, changing dysfunctional parenting practices and promoting family empowerment for families raising a child with developmental disabilities (Wakimizu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… ? + + + + Özyurt 2016 [ 29 ] CBT parent only(37) vs. WL(37) K-SADS-PL GAD&SAD&SPP&SOP 8–12(9.7±1.45) 8 w 8 Sessions SCARED-C-41 −12.42 vs.-1.31 + ? ?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore confirming this finding will require further research in future. Regarding high/unclear risk, excluding one high-risk study [ 29 ] changed the efficacy of the outcome. This finding highlighted the need for caution when interpreting the current results, and the importance of further studies to confirm our conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation