2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is type-D personality trait(s) or state? An examination of type-D temporal stability in older Israeli adults in the community

Abstract: Background. Type D personality was suggested as a marker of poorer prognosis for patients of cardiovascular disease. It is defined by having a score of 10 or more on both sub-scales of the DS14 questionnaire, Social Inhibition (SI) and Negative Affectivity (NA). As Type D was designed to predict risk, its temporal stability is of prime importance.Methods. Participants in the current study were 285 community volunteers, who completed the DS14, and other personality scales, at a mean interval of six years.Result… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zoha et al found temporal stability for the prevalence of Type D in healthy Israeli adults, the prevalence at baseline was 25.3%, which was not statistically different from the prevalence six years later. 20 A study by Jellesma et al shows that the prevalence of type D personality remained stable in Dutch schoolchildren over a period of eighteen months. 21 Ossola et al similarly showed that the prevalence of type D was stable over twelve months in Italian intensive care coronary patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zoha et al found temporal stability for the prevalence of Type D in healthy Israeli adults, the prevalence at baseline was 25.3%, which was not statistically different from the prevalence six years later. 20 A study by Jellesma et al shows that the prevalence of type D personality remained stable in Dutch schoolchildren over a period of eighteen months. 21 Ossola et al similarly showed that the prevalence of type D was stable over twelve months in Italian intensive care coronary patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research among general population in Australia, type D was recorded in 39.7% of respondents, while in analyses for the British and Irish populations, 38.5% of participants were classified as type D [23,24]. In Germany, in a study conducted in 2010 among the general population, there was a lower prevalence of distressed personality -31%, in Israel in 2011-24.1% (adult volunteers), and in Taiwan in 2013 (general population) -16% [25][26][27]. Studies conducted in Poland, mainly in selected professional groups, have shown that type D personality characterized 27.8% -45.6% of healthcare workers, 30.1% of secondary school teachers, and 43% of students who specialize in dietetics [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus gaining or losing one point on either of the subscales due to an individual’s actual change or due to measurement error is enough to change the personality status. In a community sample of older adults who self-reported on the DS14 at baseline and six years later, 56.9% of individuals who were Type D at time2 had been Type D at time1 ( Zohar, 2016 ). For children in the community ( Jellesma, 2008 ) measured twice at a 18-month interval only 42.9% of those who were Type D at time2 had been Type D at time1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%