2010
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2010.488205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Undergraduate Performance Predictive of Postgraduate Performance?

Abstract: Measures of undergraduate performance appear to be poor predictors of performance in residency that consisted of two primary dimensions (clinical acumen and human sensitivity).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 391 graduates, 124 (31.7%) matched to a family medicine residency program (see Table 1). We As previously noted, 24 our instrument measured two factors-clinical acumen (α = 0.91) and human sensitivity (α = 0.90)-and accounted for 77% of the total variance. All individual items displayed a factor loading of 0.75 or higher.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 391 graduates, 124 (31.7%) matched to a family medicine residency program (see Table 1). We As previously noted, 24 our instrument measured two factors-clinical acumen (α = 0.91) and human sensitivity (α = 0.90)-and accounted for 77% of the total variance. All individual items displayed a factor loading of 0.75 or higher.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We mailed the global rating assessment tool to resident program directors in early June of 2010, 2011, and 2012, along with a copy of the consent form. The 10-item instrument (available on request), which was initially developed by others 23 and later modified, 24 provides a two-dimension factor structure (clinical acumen and human sensitivity) along with an overall rating of performance. Scores on clinical acumen are determined by ratings received on 5 items (medical knowledge, clinical judgment, patient management, clinical skills, and pharmacology).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the background of this specific model was based on well-being and life satisfaction, including some complementary factors mentioned by Gattiker and Larwood in their model of career success, such as a job success (performance, happiness at work) and financial success [19]. Having reviewed the literature, authors decided to include work stress and burnout as symptoms of difficulty and failure in response to job expectations and as important measures of success in the medical career [20][21][22][23]. In the previous paper the authors of the article determined that success in a medical career seemed to be the consequence of the personality characteristics and not a simple result of the medical education process [24].…”
Section: Materials and Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our research, we devised a specific model based on life satisfaction and well-being, with reference to another model of career success, derived from the literature, to include such complementary factors as job success (performance, happiness at work) and material success [ 20 ]. In our model we included work stress and the tendency to burnout as expression of difficulty or defeat in response to career expectations, and as significant measures of success in a medical career [ 21 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%