Is Universal Health Coverage Affordable? Estimated Costs and Fiscal Space Analysis for the Ethiopian Essential Health Services Package

Abstract

Estimating the required resources for implementing an essential health services package (EHSP) is vital to examine its feasibility and affordability. This study aimed to estimate the financial resources required to implement the Ethiopian EHSP from 2020 to 2030. Furthermore, we explored potential alternatives to increase the fiscal space for health in Ethiopia. We used the OneHealth Tool (OHT) to estimate the costs of expanding the EHSP service provision in the public sector in Ethiopia. Combinations of ingredient-based bottom-up and program-based summary costing approaches were applied. We predicted the fiscal space using assumptions for economic growth, government resource allocations to health, external aid for health, the magnitude of outof-pocket expenditure, and other private health expenditures as critical factors affecting available resources devoted to health. All costs were valued using 2020 US dollars (USD). To implement the EHSP, 13.0 billion USD (per capita: 94 USD) would be required in 2030. The largest (50-70%) share of estimated costs was for medicines, commodities, and supplies, followed by human resources costs (10-17%). However, the expected available resources based on a business-as-usual fiscal space estimate would be 63 USD per capita for the same year. Therefore, the gap as a percentage of the required resources would be 33% in 2030. The resources needed to implement the EHSP would increase steadily over the projection period due mainly to increases in service coverage targets over time. Allocating gains from economic growth to increase the total government health expenditure could partly address the gap.

Equity in public health spending in Ethiopia: a benefit incidence analysis

“…The CBHI system should be redesigned to have a bigger pool for cross-subsidization among members. The MoH should also encourage all partners and donors to put their money in the CBHI pool to benefit all in every health programme without disparity instead of investing in a specific programme ( Hailu et al. , 2021 ).…”

‘Implementability’ matters: using implementation research steps to guide and support non-communicable disease national planning in low-income and middle-income countries

“…Ethiopia is an example of using strengthened domestic economic and budgeting capacity to bring about a robust discussion of NCD needs, resulting in significant scale-up of NCD services. 36 …”

“…Lack of costing for national NCD plans has been reported as a contributory factor for non-implementation in high-income countries34 and LMICs 35. The situation is improving, however, as global NCD service cost estimates have recently become available36 and more countries have costed NCD strategies 36. Capacity building for local health economists and budget specialists has enabled health ministries to participate in the all-important government budgeting cycle,37 and those responsible for NCD strategy implementation need to be involved 38…”

Universal Social Pensions Are Unaffordable … Not! Testing the Unaffordability Hypothesis in Latin America and the Caribbean

“…The literature proposes several proposals to help implement universal programs. For example, locally-led priority setting to select the most appropriate mix of services within resource-constrained settings (Verguet et al 2021), delivering the message that social protection is not a handout and does not disincentive economic growth (Seekings, 2017), allocating gains from economic growth to expand universal coverage (Hailu et al, 2021), among others. However, according to the ILO (2015), the core challenge for financing universal social protection remains to secure the necessary fiscal space.…”