2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is visual content in textual search interfaces beneficial to dyslexic users?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eye-tracking studies using students as the participants often explored students with learning disabilities. Specifically, Berget and Sandnes (2015) and Berget, Mulvey, and Sandnes (2016) investigated the effects of dyslexia on student performance of information searches using web-based search engines. They discovered dyslexia had a negative impact on search performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eye-tracking studies using students as the participants often explored students with learning disabilities. Specifically, Berget and Sandnes (2015) and Berget, Mulvey, and Sandnes (2016) investigated the effects of dyslexia on student performance of information searches using web-based search engines. They discovered dyslexia had a negative impact on search performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discovered dyslexia had a negative impact on search performance. Results from these studies have the potential to improve future web layout and navigation for students (Berget et al, 2016). In addition, recent studies also analyzed gaze patterns of students with autism and how autism relates to social difficulties and challenges (Falck-Ytter, 2015;Hanley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have taken a balanced approach introducing the students to a wide range of methods, including inferential statistics. Typical examples of quantitative problems studied by students and staff in our lab include comparative studies of dyslexia [56,57,58]. Such studies often compare two groups, namely, dyslexic participants and a control group, and therefore often rely on paired t-tests.…”
Section: Human-computer Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term goal of this research endeavour is to achieve invisible assistive technology that does not draw attention. The alternative view to assistive technology is universal design where there is one, non-stigmatizing, solution to be used by all, for instance, readable language [26,27,28], dyslexia [29,30,31,32,33], motor disabilities [34,35,36,37], low-vision [38,39]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%