Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions?

Abstract

Social relationships are often touted as critical for well-being. However, the vast majority of studies on social relationships have relied on self-report measures of both social interactions and well-being, which makes it difficult to disentangle true associations from shared method variance. To address this gap, we assessed the quantity and quality of social interactions using both self-report and observer-based measures in everyday life. Participants (N = 256, 3,206 observations) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), an unobtrusive audio recorder, and completed experience sampling method (ESM) self-reports of their momentary social interactions, happiness, and feelings of social connectedness, four times each day for one week. Observers rated the quantity and quality of participants' social interactions based on the EAR recordings from the same time points. Quantity of social interactions was robustly associated with greater well-being in the moment and on average, whether they were measured with selfreports or observer reports. Conversational (conversational depth and self-disclosure) and relational (knowing and liking one's interaction partners) aspects of social interaction quality were also generally associated with greater well-being, but the effects were larger and more consistent for self-reported (vs. observer-reported) quality variables, within-person (vs. betweenperson) associations, and for predicting social connectedness (vs. happiness). Finally, although most associations were similar for introverts and extraverts, our exploratory results suggest that introverts may experience greater boosts in social connectedness, relative to extraverts, when engaging in deeper conversations. This study provides compelling multi-method evidence supporting the link between more frequent and deeper social interactions and well-being.

Americans’ COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines

“…6 Thus, many of the very recommendations provided by the CDC to prevent the spread of COVID-19 7 may reduce critical social supports necessary for well-being. 6,8 Many other strategies for coping with stress, such as active coping to alleviate problems, have been shown to be helpful during a crisis; others, such as substance use coping, have been found universally maladaptive, and for still others, such as distraction, their utility may depend on the context. 9,10 Very little information is available regarding adherence to COVID-related CDC guidelines to prevent the spread of this disease.…”

Did Social Connection Decline During the First Wave of COVID-19?: The Role of Extraversion

“…In an intensive study of over 250 college students, every participant reported feeling less socially connected, on average, following an hour without social interaction (compared to an hour that included social interaction; Sun, Harris, & Vazire, 2019). In another study, adults in Canada reported having six in-person interactions with close others and eleven interactions with strangers or acquaintances on a typical day, and they reported lower feelings of belonging on days when they had fewer interactions than usual (Sandstrom & Dunn, 2014).…”

Why do people avoid talking to strangers? A mini meta-analysis of predicted fears and actual experiences talking to a stranger

“…, and when people have more conversations with others, they report being happier (Sandstrom & Dunn, 2014b;Sun et al, 2019;Watson et al, 1992).…”