12.04 - Rare ILD/DPLD 2022
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is YouTube a reliable source for patient information in lymphangioleiomyomatosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there was greater quality content provided on scientific/governmental websites, and less content on news/media websites, which were particularly lacking details on evaluation and management. Consistent with our results, scientific websites on IPF similarly provided the most content (7) as did Youtube videos on lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In general, there was greater quality content provided on scientific/governmental websites, and less content on news/media websites, which were particularly lacking details on evaluation and management. Consistent with our results, scientific websites on IPF similarly provided the most content (7) as did Youtube videos on lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Almost all patients used the internet as a source to obtain information on the disease. However, internet-based information can be inadequate, especially for rare diseases [15], e.g., in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [16]. More studies are available on cancer, but similarly, it was shown that the information needed for participating in a shared decision-making process is often unavailable on the internet [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%