2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09730-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISCEV extended protocol for the S-cone ERG

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard for full-field electroretinography (ERG) describes a minimum procedure for testing generalized retinal function but encourages more extensive testing. This extended protocol describes a method of assessing the function of the short-wavelength-sensitive cone (Scone) retinal pathway, using a short-wavelength flash superimposed on a background that saturates the rods and adapts the L/M-cones to elicit a response, known as the S-co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the clinical point of view, our next investigative steps seem well defined: i) cone-specific ERGs (S-cone ERGs and ON/OFF ERGs) to isolate individual (L, M, or S) cone responses [41] and thus support or exclude our selective cone dysfunction hypothesis; ii) post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) to test melanopsin expressing ipRGC function [21] and thus shed light on the extent of ipRGC damage. iii) long-term follow-up of the progression of a potential POAG monitoring IOPs, visual field defects, optic nerve head appearances and RNFL OCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the clinical point of view, our next investigative steps seem well defined: i) cone-specific ERGs (S-cone ERGs and ON/OFF ERGs) to isolate individual (L, M, or S) cone responses [41] and thus support or exclude our selective cone dysfunction hypothesis; ii) post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) to test melanopsin expressing ipRGC function [21] and thus shed light on the extent of ipRGC damage. iii) long-term follow-up of the progression of a potential POAG monitoring IOPs, visual field defects, optic nerve head appearances and RNFL OCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the clinical point of view, our next investigative steps seem well de ned: i) cone-speci c ERGs (Scone ERGs and ON/OFF ERGs) to isolate individual (L, M, or S) cone responses (41) and thus support or exclude our selective cone dysfunction hypothesis; ii) post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) to test melanopsin expressing ipRGC function (21) and thus shed light on the extent of ipRGC damage. iii) longterm follow-up of the progression of a potential POAG monitoring IOPs, visual eld defects, optic nerve head appearances and RNFL OCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the clinical point of view, our next investigative steps seem well defined: i) cone-specific ERGs using the "silent substitution" paradigm [43] to isolate individual (L, M, or S) cone responses [44] and thus support or exclude our selective cone dysfunction hypothesis; ii) post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) to test melanopsin expressing ipRGC function [21] and thus shed light on the extent of ipRGC damage. iii) long-term follow-up of POAG progression monitoring IOPs and visual field defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%