2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2390634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islam and Patriarchy: How Robust is Muslim Support for Patriarchal Values?

Abstract: and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
78
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In some sense, our article might have been stronger if we had been able to include more countries that have large numbers of fundamentalist Muslim respondents. Although we see little evidence of a positive influence of religiosity on the acceptability of wife‐beating among the Muslim respondents in these data, there are reasons to suppose that one might find different results if more fundamentalist Muslims were included in our analyses (Alexander and Welzel ; Inglehart and Norris ). Therefore, caution should be used in generalizing the findings in this study to the entire world population.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In some sense, our article might have been stronger if we had been able to include more countries that have large numbers of fundamentalist Muslim respondents. Although we see little evidence of a positive influence of religiosity on the acceptability of wife‐beating among the Muslim respondents in these data, there are reasons to suppose that one might find different results if more fundamentalist Muslims were included in our analyses (Alexander and Welzel ; Inglehart and Norris ). Therefore, caution should be used in generalizing the findings in this study to the entire world population.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Additionally, because factor analysis shows that the six questions tap two distinct dimensions of gender equality, I also construct two subindices. Like Norris (), Inglehart and Norris (2003a), and Alexander and Welzel (), I find that the questions regarding scarce jobs, university education, and whether women are inferior economic and political leaders form one dimension, representing orientations toward the role of women in public life . The questions regarding whether tensions emerge if a wife earns more than her husband and whether children suffer when their mother works outside of the home form a second dimension relating to orientations about women's role in the home .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…One new variable is the size of the Muslim population in 2010 . While Ross finds that having a large Muslim population has no effect on FLFP when oil wealth is included in the model, others argue that Muslim societies are particularly patriarchal (Alexander & Welzel, ; Fish, ; Inglehart & Norris, 2003b; Norris, , ). The present paper is not a study of Islam per se —rather it concerns inegalitarian gender attitudes regardless of their origins—but in light of the current debate, it is important to see whether the baseline results hold once Islam is controlled for explicitly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations