2020
DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2020.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islam, gender segregation, and political engagement: evidence from an experiment in Tunisia

Abstract: The Arab world has historically had limited descriptive representation for women, although that is changing. Will having more women officeholders lead women citizens to become more engaged? Or could it depress engagement due to pervasive gender biases? To answer these questions, this paper uses a nationally-representative experiment in Tunisia. Unexpectedly, people were less likely to want to contact their representatives when primed to think of a mixed-gender group of officeholders compared to an all-women gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This argument has been advanced most clearly by Mansbridge (1999, 641) who argues that politicians of traditionally marginalized groups provide better representation to ingroup members because they have “enhanced communication” with them. Empirical research finds that citizens are more likely to contact politicians of their race (Broockman 2014; Gay 2007), although there is less direct evidence about gender (for null results, see, for instance, Bush and Prather 2021; Haynes 1997). If female citizens “self‐select” into interacting more with female politicians and female users are more likely to give feedback to tweets on gender issues, this could potentially explain the gender‐issue feedback advantage.…”
Section: Learning From Feedback On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument has been advanced most clearly by Mansbridge (1999, 641) who argues that politicians of traditionally marginalized groups provide better representation to ingroup members because they have “enhanced communication” with them. Empirical research finds that citizens are more likely to contact politicians of their race (Broockman 2014; Gay 2007), although there is less direct evidence about gender (for null results, see, for instance, Bush and Prather 2021; Haynes 1997). If female citizens “self‐select” into interacting more with female politicians and female users are more likely to give feedback to tweets on gender issues, this could potentially explain the gender‐issue feedback advantage.…”
Section: Learning From Feedback On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, ethnonationalist norms surrounding female seclusion 3 See Banerjee et al ( 2021) and Hankla et al (2023). and women's segregation (e.g., Bush and Prather 2020;Chakravarti 1993) may inhibit core female candidates' ability to interact effectively with constituents or with state officials with whom they may need to connect to serve their constituents' needs. Moreover, ethnonationalist gender norms surrounding women's assertiveness (e.g., Luke and Munshi 2011) may undermine core women's ability, once elected, to wield power within a party's ranks (e.g., Clayton and Zetterberg 2021).…”
Section: Argument and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second debate topic was over female political leadership, another controversial topic in Tunisia (Blackman and Jackson, 2021; Bush and Prather, 2021). On the day our second study ended, Tunis elected its first female mayor, Souad Abderrahim.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%